Interesting miscut

[Eric1977]

Found this while digging through some stuff a while back. Not in the best of shape but its pretty cool. I've never seen a back with four different cards on it. Anyone one else have any oddities like this to share?

[Cliff Bowman]

Not mine, but there are always similar miscuts of 1964 Topps on eBay.

[ALR-bishop]

That one is pretty interesting though with 4 different cards on one back

[Cliff Bowman]

Another one.

[KCRfan1]

That's so cool. After a little research the two cards on the left are Gene Alley and Ted Uhlaender.

[Eric72]

Originally Posted by Eric1977

I've never seen a back with four different cards on it. Anyone one else have any oddities like this to share?

There are a few that have been posted over on the Pre-War side of this board.

That's a very cool card you have there. I never tire of seeing these extreme printing anomalies.

Best regards,

Eric

[mybestbretts]

Isn't it interesting. Now those are what I would call miscut.
PSA says anything off 1/34th of an inch

[Cliff Bowman]

A couple of 1981 Topps slight miscuts.

[David W]

Lou Brock color variations and miscuts.

[darkhorse9]

I gotta admit, this is a subset of our hobby that I just don't get. These things would be in the trash the second I got my hands on them and I'd never look back.

I fail to see the charm in these.

[bosoxfan]

That 75 Brock is just too funny

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by darkhorse9

I gotta admit, this is a subset of our hobby that I just don't get. These things would be in the trash the second I got my hands on them and I'd never look back.

I fail to see the charm in these.

I suppose that you don't care much for these either . I agree that it's an acquired taste.

[steve B]

That 78 Stanley is really cool. More than usual ink spatter, and it makes him look like a character from a chainsaw movie.

The massive overinkings with the matching card aren't at all easy to find unless they happened to be in the same box.

Steve B

[SMPEP]

Great cards Cliff! Awesome to find the tops (pun intended) and bottom cards like that.

Definitely keep them together!

Cheers,
Patrick

[goheels]

I like your taste in cards.

[Cliff Bowman]

Forgot this jewel .

[7nohitter]

Originally Posted by darkhorse9

i gotta admit, this is a subset of our hobby that i just don't get. These things would be in the trash the second i got my hands on them and i'd never look back.

I fail to see the charm in these.

exactly

[Exhibitman]

darkhorse9, I feel the same way about allegedly high grade cards in slabs.

The charms of the freaks and geeks are many-fold:

--They show something about the printing and cutting process
--They are unique, especially compared to the thousands of examples of the run of the mill card
--They are rare
--They are still remarkably inexpensive in postwar sets

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by Exhibitman

darkhorse9, I feel the same way about allegedly high grade cards in slabs.

The charms of the freaks and geeks are many-fold:

--They show something about the printing and cutting process
--They are unique, especially compared to the thousands of examples of the run of the mill card
--They are rare
--They are still remarkably inexpensive in postwar sets

Couldn't have said it better myself .