![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings,
I am in search of a bit of information on some oversized cards. I don't currently collect any of these, so I thought I would inquire here as I'm certain this would be the best chance at getting correct info. I specifically need to know the thickness of a T3,4,5, E125 or really any other issue that would be slabbed in a "oversize" grading holder. If anyone has one of these issues and the means (micrometers or calipers) and would provide me with the actual card thickness (within .010" or 1/4 mm) I would be forever in your debt. Thank you in advance, Rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My digital calipers indicate my T3 Lobert ranges from 0.53/0.54/0.55/0.55mm measured from each side.
several other random measurements around the card fell in the same range, but gave a max of 0.56mm. Z Wheat |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They aren't as thick as I would have guessed. I am researching for improvments to a holder for these issues.
Thank you very much for taking the time to help out. Rob |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And of the real cabinet cards, like the N173 Old Judges and T5 Pinkertons will be thicker than the T3s. The T3s are just a print, while the true cabinets have a a photo print pasted to a heavier cardboard backing and thus can be much thicker.
If you want some measurements of general cabinet cards and CDVs, I could provide you that-- but I don't own any T5s, N173s, T3s or such. Last edited by drcy; 01-02-2014 at 04:20 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Thank you for the info and your offer to help! Rob |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Please tell me you're doing this research for SGC, PLEASE!!!
![]() I've been waiting patiently for nearly a year now for SGC to improve their cabinet-sized holders (I have a couple T3s that currently slide around in the slab). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
My thoughts as well! Z Wheat |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oops I forgot about this thread. I just measured three random but standard 1890s-early 1900s and the measured 64mm with one 63mm. Just a test.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for reporting your findings.
Rob |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone having issues? | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 08-19-2012 06:59 PM |
First 30 issues of SCD ?...a little O/T | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-10-2007 10:54 AM |
looking for several PCL issues | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-23-2006 12:20 PM |
Type card collecting...Tough issues..Really Tough issues..Part II..Cabinet Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 05-09-2005 12:54 PM |
Type card collecting...Tough issues..Really Tough issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 05-06-2005 03:34 PM |