![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: kyle lentine
I mentiond 2 t205's I have that are short. My scanning is poor but I will try to post the cards in question. Please give me honest opinions if you feel they might be trimmed. Both cards are about 1/32 short top to bottom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David
I agree 100% with Brian's thoughts on legitimate size variations. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lee Behrens
I question the bottom cut on the harmon and the top cut on the Devlin. A scan with a color background would be more helpful. Checking the color of the stock on all the edges is a good indicator also. The edges I question seem too sharp for the amonunt of chipping. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I questioned the same thing recently on a different series. I bought a Mayo Foutz (don't even know why) from Scott B. I told him I thought it could have a problem because all of the corners looked too sharp. He said bring it to the show ( a few weeks ago) and we'll see. I'll be darned if it did not measure EXACTLY with the other cards, had the same chipping on the back on 2 sides just like they did, and look like many of his other Mayo's. Point is that just because the corners come to points I don't think we should come to conclusions. We need to loupe (sp?) the card to see the edges better and see if they have the same characteristics as other ones. Just my penny worth....haven't been posting much the last few days so had to stretch my legs......regards all |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
and it came back trimmed one month, then graded 84 nm the next month. Ah, but then consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian Hodes
Kyle- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: lentel
What made you send the T218 back to them? Just hoping it would grade or?? I am just a little curious? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: edhans
I agree with Lee on both counts. The wear patterns do not seem to match. Better scans would be helpful. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E Card Sizes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-12-2006 04:58 PM |
t206 sizes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-23-2006 04:23 PM |
Card Sizes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-14-2005 08:02 AM |
T205 Sizes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-18-2002 06:59 PM |
Hey, why didn't anybody ever tell me that old judges come in different sizes? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-02-2001 04:05 PM |