 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-13-2021, 02:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
M101-2 Supplements in Memory Lane
Didn't want to post this in the Memory Lane auction thread and take away from it.
As someone in that other thread mentioned, the prices for the various M101-2 Sporting News Supplements were through the roof. What I don't understand though is why they all only got graded as PSA1. The descriptions said there were no pinholes, stains, or other visible issues (except maybe some minor spider creases on the backs that was mentioned in the Cobb/Wagner, Cobb, and Mathewson supplement descriptions)), and they all looked great in the scans. So why such low grades across the board? These are extremely fragile paper supplements so, finding them in decent shape is always tough to begin with. Anybody have any idea behind the reasoning, would love to hear it? Also, is this something new for PSA to be grading? In the past I know Beckett at least used to grade them, but wasn't aware that SGC or PSA were. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thanks Memory Lane | Stonepony | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 12-17-2015 03:14 PM |
| Memory Lane - I Own it Now | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 03-22-2013 09:21 AM |
| Memory Lane | margoaepi | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 01-10-2012 01:13 PM |
| Memory Lane | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-14-2009 03:09 PM |
| Will Memory Lane EVER end? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-16-2006 04:18 AM |
Threaded Mode