 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-25-2017, 10:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Would this be a defect preventing a Gem Mint 10?
Looks like the actual card stock has an imperfection, however the original printing and gloss are in tact. This wasn't from an impact, but appears to be the way the card was manufactured. Would this little bump disqualify it from being a 10 or would it not effect the eye appeal.
  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mcgraw print defect | martin neal | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 08-27-2020 08:01 PM |
| Where's the defect??? Aaron rookie. | ullmandds | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 23 | 07-21-2016 05:51 PM |
| T206 birth defect | Ladder7 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-24-2014 07:30 PM |
| Weird Old Judge Defect / Bubney 75 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-10-2005 05:07 PM |
| preventing switched cards in holders | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-19-2003 12:40 PM |
Threaded Mode