![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do you guys think of this Babe?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scratchy but I like the looks of it.
Tom C |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Tom I appreciate the feedback.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any other opinions?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm no expert but I think real...
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My amateur eye likes it
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Babe auto aside, why in heck did someone write out Lincoln's Gettysburg Address on a piece of bank stationery and then get The Bambino to sign it?? I know Wilkes Barre isn't too far from Gettysburg, but what the hey?? Inquiring minds want to know, what is the connection between Babe Ruth and this piece of paper or that bank?
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm far from an autograph expert, but I feel I have a pretty good eye for Ruth. I'm about 99%+ positive this is no good. It would also be atypical for Ruth to write the name of city and date it. In addition, the "a" and "e" in "Babe" are off. The "a" is a little too narrow and pointy, and the middle of the "e" is too pointy as well. In my honest opinion....
Last edited by Bpm0014; 06-08-2015 at 07:07 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Authenticity aside (although I happen to agree with BPM on this one), I simply don't like this piece aesthetically. Both it's condition and placement on the document greatly detract from its ability to be properly displayed.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Actually, after examining this a second time, I'm 100% convinced it's no good. Almost every letter in "Barre" is off. When Ruth writes "Sincerely", the "ere" almost look identical. In "Barre", the "r" and "e" are distinct....and wrong. No good 100%.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you everyone for the feedback. I need to get better at identifying a good Ruth signature myself. The story I got was that it was obtained in Wilkes Berra during a barnstorming game. I have read that Ruth played up there and also hunted and fished in the area. That's all I have but would love to hear more and learn more about the Babe's auto. Thanks again.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Shoeless Moe; 06-08-2015 at 10:53 AM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
that being said, i dont know if its real or not, but those reasons aren't really valid for determining the authenticity. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The relation of the letters to where they fall in the word, isn't as important as the connection of the letters ("r" to the "e") themselves. If someone can post a picture (or mulitples) of how the Babe writes the word "Sincerely", you'll know what I mean. They are extremely uniform. Here, they are vastly different. Nor do his "r's" even remotely look like the example above....
sinceREly wilkes barRE Last edited by Bpm0014; 06-08-2015 at 12:17 PM. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am certainly no expert in the Babe, especially his very day handwriting. What I know is that his "E"'s in his regular handwriting always look like the funky E in his signature. The R's in the OP (in Barre) may be a bit off but not terribly so, especially if there was an issue with the writing implement which seems like it may have been the case here.
I don't know. If that is a fake Ruth, it is a really really good one. That said, I agree that the media and placement thereupon leaves a ton to be desired. Tom C Last edited by btcarfagno; 06-08-2015 at 01:12 PM. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My personal opinion is no good.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I also agree with you about the 'a', but while his 'a' is often narrow, it doesn't come up to the 'b' that way. Just my two cents - nice not to have any skin in the game on these discussions.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 06-09-2015 at 10:26 AM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When Ruth writes "Sincerely", the "ere" almost look identical.
Hi Scott. To clarify, I said the ere almost look identical (although you can definitely spot a subtle difference) in an authentic one. But yes, we are on the same page haha. The example above looks nothing like an authentic one. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Careful, you might get a reputation...that could follow you all across the internet
![]()
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Haha. I'm ok with that...
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you again for all of the feedback. It's greatly appreciated.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS:R315 Babe Ruth,1920 W516 BABE RUTH, Mathewson 1927 York Walter Johnson,Hoyt ROOKIE | vintagehofrookies | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 23 | 03-20-2015 05:36 PM |
Babe Ruth Autographed Baseball Thoughts | niembre | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 41 | 11-17-2014 02:52 PM |
SOLD!!! BABE RUTH! 1951 RAISIN BRAN BABE RUTH RING! SCARCE PINK! Ends Mon 3-31! | GoldenAge50s | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 6 | 03-31-2014 07:23 PM |
FS: 1921 W516-2-2 Babe Ruth & 1926 W512 Babe Ruth Panel | pencil1974 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-12-2014 03:46 PM |
Thoughts on this Babe Ruth please | toyman55 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 20 | 03-18-2013 08:48 AM |