![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi All,
I think I might have just learned my first expensive lesson of the hobby (and feel pretty stupid to boot). Back in October I purchased a raw 1953 Bowman Color Stan Musial. The card came in and is beautiful. I stored it away planning on getting it graded later with a larger lot. About a week ago I saw a posting on this forum about a seller on Ebay that was potentially modifying their cards and photos. My heart sank as it was the same seller that I purchased my Musial from. Sure enough I measured it this evening and it appears to be 1/16" short (see scan below). I have reached out to the seller to see if I can still return the card. We shall see but I am not hopeful. My question for the group is: 1) Is 1/16" inside of the normal variation of 1953 Bowmans? 2) How common is trimming in our hobby? (I am clueless here) 3) Outside of buying graded cards (and cards from folks here), how do you protect to yourself from trimmed cards? Should I be measuring every card I buy? Here is the picture: Trimmed or not trimmed? baseball bowman 4_0003.jpg Oh, and I guess this means that I am back in the market for a great condition 1953 Bowman Musial....
__________________
Actively building a 1953 Bowman Color PSA Registry Set (Currently 150/160) and attempting a 1947 Tip Top Bread Set. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My guess at first glance is that is trimmed and I believe it would came back as such if submitted. You can tell from the amount of border left on top compared to the bottom. If it was just miscut the top would have much more showing but as you can see from the scan the top is close to be same in diameter as the sides.
As far as how prevalent within the hobby my opinion is it isn't happening as often as it used to before TPG's. I think it was easier to pull the wool over buyers eyes 20 or so years ago. The internet has given every on the ability to quick look up a card to see different examples in different grades instantly. I remember only knowing what a card might look like from a grainy photo in a collecting magazine. People at more wise to it too. That's not to say there are not still those dong it I just think it's as common of practice as it used to be. However, all the cards that were trimmed before are still out there somewhere so they will surface. It's just a matter of time. I'm sorry about your experience. I hope the seller steps up and offers a refund. That is such a classic beauty if a card I would hate to think every time you think of it you have a bad taste in your mouth instead of seeing the card for how it was intended. Best of luck, Drew
__________________
Drew |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it's a 1/16 short its trimmed... Just my guess
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A couple of months ago I bought a card off of ebay that seemed like it could be trimmed. So before I pulled the trigger, I sent the seller a simple question asking if the card measured out correctly. He replied that he measured it himself and it was perfect. When I received the card, it was trimmed both ways, top to bottom AND side to side. That's why it didn't look so blatant on screen, because it was still rather proportional. I frickin' lost my mind on this idiot. He blatantly lied when he told me it measured out perfectly and he had the f_cking nerve to call me a liar to boot. That I was trying to rip him off and get this measly $5 card for free. I opened a case on ebay and provided them with a picture of the card atop a ruler along with his reply to me stating the card measured out correctly and it took ebay like 7 minutes to find in my favor and refund my money.
It may be too late for you to do the same thing, because a lot of time has elapsed, but if the seller refuses to give you a refund, you should definitely get on the phone with ebay and see if they will help. Good luck!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The hobby is littered with unscrupulous people trying to make a quick buck, there are plenty of them. As collectors, it is up to us to decide how much risk we're willing to take. If you buy raw cards, you know in advance you are taking a risk that the card may have been altered. You were able to purchase the card for less than you'd have paid for a PSA graded version of the card in similar condition. You knew this prior to buying the card, for you easily could have purchased the Musial card already in a PSA holder in similar condition to the one you bought, you would have just paid a premium for it.
So, in my opinion, as a buyer in the wild-wild-west that is eBay, if you're buying raw cards off eBay and you receive a card you believe is trimmed... caveat emptor. And quite honestly, that's how it should be to provide even greater value and acceptance of PSA graded cards. Who knows if the seller even knew it was trimmed, and if indeed it is, if they trimmed it themselves? While your Musial looks blatantly short, it's difficult to figure out who to point fingers at, so I think the easiest person to point at in such situations is right in the mirror. Last edited by a761506; 01-17-2015 at 02:24 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because trimming was so common for so many years many cards are sold as good but were trimmed 2 or 3 owners ago. Of course some sellers are also just unscrupulous. As previously stated thanks to the tpg s there is less trimming going on right now, but I'm always wary of buying raw high end cards and check feedback and reputations. I also measure cards as soon as I get them just to be safe. Last time I got burnt was on a bazooka atg cobb because it was an unfamiliar issue size to me. It happens to most of us at one pointer another.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thank you for the thoughts.... I take responsibility for my naiveté...
__________________
Actively building a 1953 Bowman Color PSA Registry Set (Currently 150/160) and attempting a 1947 Tip Top Bread Set. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Working on my '66 Topps set at the National last year I bought a trimmed Clemente. I never thought it was something I had to look out for there. I learned a tough lesson months later when I put it in a magnetic and finally saw that it was trimmed quite a bit. It wasn't even the perfect card. From now on I'll carry a base Topps card just so I can compare every card I look at.
__________________
Collecting: 1966 Topps Baseball Set Last edited by Gmrson; 01-31-2015 at 11:13 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a good start, but I also recommend buying a loupe and learning how to distinguish between a factory cut and a non-factory cut. A short card doesn’t always mean it’s trimmed.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The black in the right pic shows how the card is a little short L/R, but much more T/B.
__________________
Collecting: 1966 Topps Baseball Set Last edited by Gmrson; 02-16-2015 at 01:12 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your 1966 Clemente looks like a factory miscut to me. It is highly unlikely that someone would purposely trim a card in that manner and try to pass it off as legitimate.
Last edited by a761506; 02-16-2015 at 02:14 PM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the input!
__________________
Collecting: 1966 Topps Baseball Set |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This is also a good method to tell if cards have been re-colored - for example '71 Topps. The black marker or Sharpee will always bleed through to the edges and when you stack a group of them together and one of them has been recolored, that black in will stick out like a sore thumb from the others. Edited: My picture is not the best in the world, but you get the idea. You can get a really good look with a loupe. Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 02-17-2015 at 06:44 PM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you suspect the Clemente of being trimmed, pay close attention to the top border. If it is trimmed, that's where I suspect it will be.
Look at the bottom border of your card. See how the bottom border tilts upwards as you look at it from left to right? In other words, you have more bottom border on the right side of the card than you do on the left side of the card? Typically (but not always), when you see a border like the, the opposite border should have the same characteristic. In other words, the top border should slope slightly too. However, yours doesn't. It is straight across. That would concern me. I'm not saying it's trimmed, but that's where I would start to look if you suspect it of being trimmed. Look at this Clemente on eBay. See how the bottom border slopes upwards from left to right. Then look at the top border and you can see the same slope(but in the opposite direction). In other words, the bottom of the card has more border on the right side of the card than it does on the left side of the card, but the top of the card has more border on the left side of the card than it does on the right. Make sense? Now look at the two sides. See how the left border slopes? You have more border near the bottom than near the top. Now see how the right border slopes. It's just the opposite, you have more border on the top than on the bottom. My point is, when one border slopes the opposite border should usually (again, not always) slope too. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trimming | Bruinsfan94 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-18-2011 01:10 PM |
Evidence of trimming | kylebicking | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-04-2010 04:03 PM |
Question about Trimming | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-12-2007 12:49 PM |
G-VG t206 Common for G-VG t205 common | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 02-20-2006 07:44 AM |
trimming obsession | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-04-2003 10:19 PM |