![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi everyone. I just bought a SGC graded T206 Nap Lajoie Portrait with an Old Mill back. There is only 1 Old Mill back Lajoie Portrait in the PSA pop report and only 1 in the SGC report. It was in low grade, but is this considered a scarce back for a Lajoie? Would it be a premium at all to T206 collectors? I didn't pay much, so any information is greatly appreciated from the T206 collectors here. Thanks,
Andrew |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
...That Old Mill will sometimes bring a light premium for commons, but not much of a bump for HOFers. Nice card, to be sure, but not much excitement in Old Mill.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, Old Mill backs are not super tough, but just wanted to know since it is not common for a Lajoie Portrait to have a Old Mill back. Like in the PSA report, there is 18 Old Mill Lajoie with bat versus the lone portrait. Thank you for the info.
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When I first saw your post, I initially thought similar to T206Collector -- that the Old Mill back wouldn't give much of a bump for a HOFer front. For example, T206museum.com lists the Old Mill as a 1.3 multiplier (ie, 30% bump) for common fronts but no increase for someone like Lajoie.
But then I checked on VCP (given that you had already combed through the PSA and SGC pop reports), and they only record 2 sales of a Lajoie Portrait with Old Mill back (and SGC 30 for $180 and a PSA 4 for $750), versus innumerable sales with Piedmont/SC fronts. So I wonder if you actually might be onto something.
__________________
collecting T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, and 1952 Bowman. e-mails preferred over PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All other things being equal, most collectors will take an Old Mill over a Piedmont or Sweet Cap. Typical premium is 15-20% in my experience.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Am aware of the whole Old Mill overprint scandal, but I was under the impression that the perpetrators of that fraud had made their amends and that the site remained reliable. Am I mistaken?
Also, my impression is that the T206.org valuation calculator uses the same numbers as T206museum.com, with the difference that T206museum lists the individual back and grade multipliers.
__________________
collecting T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, and 1952 Bowman. e-mails preferred over PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
Question About T206...Burns CHI AL | green rhino123 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 10-19-2009 03:20 PM |
T206 EPDG Back Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 05-23-2009 01:12 PM |
T206 reprint question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-20-2004 11:22 AM |
A Question For The T206 Collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-25-2003 08:14 PM |