Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan
Shown here, I have provided the current data from SGC's pop reports of these 8 cards. Can some one here please provide the corresponding
data from the PSA pop reports ?
>>>>>> Of course, there is no way of knowing from these numbers how many times these cards have been re-graded. <<<<<<
Subject ............. P 350 ....... EPDG ........... P 150 ...... SOV 150 ...... SC 150 ....... HINDU
DAHLEN ................ X ............. 1 ................. 28 ............. 1 .............. 17 .............. 1
EWING ................. 1 .............. 5 ................. 53 ............. 6 .............. 40 .............. 3
GANLEY ................ 6 ............. 4 ................. 48 .............. 6 .............. 36 .............. 6
T. JONES .............. 4 ............. 3 ................. 64 .............. 4 .............. 39 .............. 3
KARGER ................ 3 ............. 4 ................. 46 .............. 7 .............. 25 .............. 0
LINDAMAN ............ 1 ............. 3 ................. 58 ............... 1 .............. 24 .............. 6
MULLIN ................ X ............. 1 ................. 37 .............. X .............. 16 .............. 0
SCHULTE .............. 0 ............. 0 ................. 47 .............. 1 .............. 13 .............. 5
NOTE
I substituted " X " for Dahlen in the P 350 and Mullin in the P 350 and SOV 150 columns, since the SGC pop report shows NO graded cards
for these respective backs on these two cards.
My collection includes Dahlen with a P 350 card. And, three Mullin cards....one P 350 card and two SOV 150 cards.
TED Z
|
LEE....well said in post #39
" You can eliminate one Ewing EPDG off the PSA pop report. I have crossed it into a SGC holder.
I don't think that I need to point out that this is a big reason why these pop reports can only being taken with minimal accuracy. "
Lee
Although, I posted these SGC numbers (for comparison sake) ...... I'm in complete agreement with you regarding POP reports.
TED Z