Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Bergin
Well, I try to stay out of these type of skirmishes, but..............didn't Spence just buy into SGC and bring his own people over?
It's already been revealed in pretty obvious fashion that Spence and his people are in fact discriminating based on what authentication a piece is accompanied by.
GAI apparently has a bad reputation with autographs. It wouldn't shock me if GAI cards become the next target of.............."well if it's in that holder.......it must be bad".
Anyways. My simple take on the matter. If it's still in the holder....refund. If it's not........then don't.
|
Ahhh, great point and one that I overlooked. And I had been reading those threads- just hadn't thought of them when I posted.
I also agree with what you say- if it's still in the holder-refund. If not,....then don't (but at least try to work it out so everyone involved is satisfied * had to add that
).
Sincerely, Clayton