Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
James you say don't throw mud and then proceed to throw it at PSA. At least you have now revealed your anti-PSA bias.
I don't understand your take on the Haas lawsuit. He wanted it bumped and was being an ass about it and therefore SGC had the right to keep the card? Could you explain? Thanks.
|
Peter my reply was speciftic to WarHoundR69 who just said Dave held a card.
There was more involved and I didn't have time to look for the article.
Here it is
http://www.nypost.com/seven/02102008...ace_153368.htm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob D.
Mud-throwing aside, thanks for providing my laugh for the day. After starting off with "Try not to throw mud if you don't know the details," we get (in order):
- "I forget all the fine points of the suit ..."
- "I believe and they wanted it crossed ..."
- "but I do recall ... "
- "This was in one of the NY papers probably post of newsday."
Upon further review, maybe those nasty details aren't so important after all. |
Again see above.
There did want it crossed, and the owner was a part owner in GAI, oh and it WAS in the NEW YORK POST.
So I guess all my details were not so far off and that there was basis for Forman to hold the card as he wanted a release signed so that there could be no suit again SGC.
My points were pretty damn on and for those who laughed read the article.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/02102008...ace_153368.htm
James G