Upon deep reflection, I now realize I was wrong. A reasonable man must, it seems so obvious now, believe any and every claim made against a company and never look at evidence to see if it is true. When there is a dispute about a contract or a bill or a list of items, it is akin to denying the holocaust to look at the document in question. Shaping my opinions around evidence, as I used to do, is much inferior to knee-jerk whining about whatever opinion people I'm butthurt about from completely unrelated long ago threads posted. Evidence, the most basic parts of western logic, seeing if things are actually true, these are the real problems. I learn so much from our wise men here.
Hopefully the enlightened wise men who reject the concept of using an evidentiary basis as reasonable are never accused of anything. By their principles, everyone would have to just believe it is true without any evidence at all.
|