Quote:
Originally Posted by rand1com
Last line on the contract appears to state 60/40 split on authentication which likely means the same ratio for that expense as on the final take. At least, that is how I interpreted that line.
I doubt very seriously the AH is covering all of the authentication fees.
|
Would the prior line, stating no additional fees, contradict (or negate) that final line?
Also, on that last line, who pays the 60% and who pays the 40% isn't specified. In other places, the consignor GETS the 60%. Does that final line imply the consignor gets, or pays, the 60%?
Would that ambiguity create a legal loophole?