Quote:
Originally Posted by packs
I understand that. But what do you consider to be great? I consider it to be a player you're unlikely to ever see again. I love Griffey, but Trout is still active. I don't really see a lot separating them or feel like I'll never see another Griffey again.
I don't know how people define their feelings for Mays, but a lot of people describe him as a once in a life player. That is my opinion on Rickey. I really don't think anyone will ever be a better lead off hitter than he was and I highly doubt his accomplishments will be surpassed, and that's because he was impossibly good at what he did.
|
It’s not what I consider, it’s your given reasons. You said it was because he was five tool and then had to walk back the importance of five tools because Rickey requires a rather broad definition of them to qualify.
You said he’s over Griffey because Griffey was not as good the second half of his career, even though he was more effective than Rickey’s last decade.
If the judgement requires having to find reasons after the first few fail and ends on a subjective feeling, it’s just not a very compelling argument.