View Single Post
  #7  
Old 07-18-2022, 09:24 AM
Tyruscobb Tyruscobb is offline
β.Γ.Ҽ.Ո.Ť Ḋ.Ÿ.Σ
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldjudge View Post
How can it be a Babe Ruth card if nowhere on the card is the player identified? They drew a Ruth like figure but avoided paying royalties since there is no name. To me the card is worthless.
Babe Ruth's name not appearing on the card does not mean it is not a Babe Ruth card. The image and likeness (not a name) is what make it a Ruth card.

The artist did not draw a "Ruth like figure," he/she drew Ruth from a photograph (just like the T-206 cards were drawn/painted from real life photographs). Here is one of many photographs that could have served as the model. It is not even debatable that the card shows Ruth.

Worthless? Maybe to you, but the market indicates otherwise.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Ruth1.jpg (12.0 KB, 260 views)
File Type: jpg Ruth2.jpg (6.6 KB, 259 views)
Reply With Quote