Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
The great Ernie Banks described what it was like to face Koufax. “It was frightening. He had that tremendous fastball that would rise,
|
Given that it's literally impossible for a fastball to rise, please forgive me if I take this with a grain of salt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Randy Johnson was 9 or 10 inches taller than Sandy Koufax. So, even though Koufax pitched on a mound that was as much as 5 inches higher than the modern mound, Randy Johnson had the advantage of a much higher release point than Sandy Koufax. So, Johnson was taller, had longer arms, and released the ball at a point much closer to the plate.
Should Randy Johnson be considered greater because of the advantage of his height, or should Koufax be considered greater because he did not have the same advantages?
Sandy Koufax threw the ball as hard or harder than Randy Johnson did, but 35 years earlier… without the specialized training techniques, coaching, science on mechanics, health and other advances, and modern day pampering.
|
1) This is laughable. C'mon. Surely you can see the difference between height and a different pitching mound?
2) You don't know that Koufax threw harder than Johnson.
Of course guys like Aaron, Banks, Mays, and so on are going to be biased toward Koufax. How come you're not quoting Wade Boggs or Tony Gwynn or Will Clark?