Quote:
Originally Posted by Topnotchsy
Scott,
I came and asked for opinions. Can't ask for anything more than a perspective that is developed, and some really nice scans of other lineup cards.
I do tend to think the value is higher (can't say it for certain, but I did pay more than that...) for a few reasons:
1) Top copy vs. carbon copy. As a general rule, the top copy often sells for multiples of a carbon copy. (A really extreme example, was from Heritage back a decade ago when they sold both the top copy and carbon copy of Game 7 of the 1960 World Series. The top copy sold for $5300 and the carbon copy went for $260.)
2) While Rose is the hit leader, he is not in the Hall of Fame and from what I have seen, Brett has a stronger following. (I'm not an expert on either player, but that is what it seems like to me.)
Also, here are some other milestone games and prices I've tracked:
- Spahn 300th win carbon copy - $4,060
- Molitor 3000th hit $2005 (auction also included a game used bat, which seems to be roughly a $500 item)
- Rose 4192 hit (dugout wall) - $11,400
- Griffey 500th homer - $1,600 (this is shockingly low to me)
- Gary Carter most games by catcher - $717
- Ripken ties consecutive game record - $3,258
- Ripken sets consecutive game record - $15,405
|
Thanks Jeff,
I'm in agreement that there is no doubt that original copies of lineup cards should carry a heavy premium over carbon copies. For this reason I really have never collected the carbon copies.
Thanks for providing the comparison prices which are helpful.
That being said, I believe that the $1500 price of the Molitor 3,000th hit game is a very good measuring stick (excluding the GU bat) as a first glance.
I'm curious if this Molitor auction had both home and visiting umpire lineup cards like you have for Brett. Obviously this would have a major bearing on valuation. Both Brett & Molitor are HOF'er 3,000 hit guys although I would definitely give the edge to Brett on popularity.