Quote:
Originally Posted by jerrys
Mike C. says......only really shows two cards that are probably mistakes...the first two.
Probably!? These are shameful products of a professional grading company!
Also "...but IMO SGC makes slightly fewer (mistakes), making them my choice for the most part..."
perhaps you should consider that PSA is a much larger business and grades a great many more cards than SGC.
I took time to demonstrated extreme grading inconsistencies but they are condoned for bias reasons. Shame.
Perhaps some gross mistakes made by other grading companies could be shown here rather than the "oh yea" type comment - "the same things apply to PSA as well" - that is just too simple a reply. Show them!
|
I'm not a PSA hater, that's why I made the comments that I did. EVERY TPG makes mistakes....EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Make sure you read that over and over so it sticks. I know the whole volume thing with PSA, but I've seen a lot more inconsistencies with them vs SGC...A LOT. You showed two examples
I didn't comment for a while because it wasn't worth my time.
If you read this board, you know all about PSA and their roller coaster grading...I truly believed you knew about this already? Do we need to bring up the PSA 6 with paper loss...do we really? A big ole COME ON MAN!
Like I've said before, I like PSA, but over the last few years and several thousands of cards, I choose SGC for prewar. I don't mind if you or anyone else feels differently. It is what it is...
Don't be a hater because I reject the Kool-Aid
