Quote:
Originally Posted by calvindog
You said that unless he is indicted then he's not guilty of fraud -- that was wrong.
I said fraud occurred in his auctions and that whether or not he's indicted, fraud still occurred in his auctions -- that is correct. PS -- he can also be found liable for civil fraud.
As I'm not a prosecutor I don't control who gets indicted -- that is correct.
I understand these concepts are difficult for you because you're a clueless moron with no experience in these issues -- again, correct.
|
I think that the final determinant of Brent's is innocence or guilt will be a matter decided by the court, not by you or I. As I've said before, you think he's guilty and ought to be prosecuted - if you are correct, then I'm sure we'll see him behind bars. Now goodnight.