Quote:
Originally Posted by cfc1909
we used to look at the set as 150,350 and 460. This is looking at the set by back.
Doyle is print group 3.
Piedmont 350 is in print group 1,2,3,5 and 6.
Doyle is not a 350 only, he is in print group 3.
What I have been saying-do not look at the set by back, look at it by front groups.
I am actually calm, I don't post in bold and caps.
|
Who the heck is looking at the T206 set by backs....only ? Are you living in La-La land ?
Jeff Burdick, Lionel Carter, Buck Barker, Bill Heitman, Scot Reader (and others) have well established the T206 structure from both a FRONTS and BACKS perspective.
Many of us long-time T206 collectors are very well versed in the T206 set's player make-up with respect to the various series. I, for one, arrange all my T206 sets in my
albums by series (150, 350-only, 350/460, 460-only, and So. Lgrs)
Many of us T206 "traditionalists" have a complete understanding of this set from a FRONTS and BACKS perspective. And, that your so-called "print groups" are the new way
and only way to view T206's is absolutely ridiculous.
This "new speak" reminds me of the "new math" that was shoved down kids throats in the 1970's. And, very like your print groups, the new math only tended to confuse.
Sorry, but you can keep your confusig print group scheme to yourselves. Many of us will stick to our traditional thinking of the T206 set......for it has led to many ground-
breaking discoveries on this forum these past 7 years....ever since Scot Reader published his book "Inside T206 (2006). It motivated many of us on this forum to delve into
the "nitty-gritty" of The Monster and come up with a better understanding of the T206 set. Furthermore, there was an amazing bunch of guys who were willing to share
their T206 expertise and discoveries with all of us.
Your incessant nasty comments towards anyone on this forum who dares to post their thoughts regarding the T206 set has become tedious and tiresome. So, quit this shit
TED Z