Quote:
Originally Posted by JT
It would appear that if they just disclosed this "tell" to whomever, and not mention any names, there is absolutely no chance for litigation.
Simple enough, if true,
|
I don't get why you all are so hung up on this 'tell'. First of all, 'tells' aren't 100% conclusive - if they were, then someone would have revealed a 'tell' of Ruth himself, that would allow us to identify every single legitimate Ruth autograph.
Is everyone really failing to see that the 'tell' is not the issue here?
Do you all really think that Chris is that dumb? Seriously, I don't agree with all of his opinions, but he's a smart guy and he's always been very careful.