Quote:
Originally Posted by tedzan
In fact, I'd say it is indicative of that ole "not invented here syndrome".
|
Actually I suffer from "that information doesn't
jive jibe" syndrome.
Ted - My opinion that the A+B+C+D not being a hard and fast rule isn't something new. I sent you a detailed email in 2010 explaining why I was skeptical of it. You said it was a lot to digest and that you would get back to me. Between then and now there haven't been the number of new Broad Leaf or Drum confirmations necessary to change my opinion, and you haven't gotten back to me. So for now I remain skeptical and my opinion is moot.
Any similarities between the AB350 (No Frame) subjects that were also printed with BL460 is mere coincidence. The two backs were printed with different groups of subjects and at different times. Coincidences between cherry picked subjects, from two different groups, will only lead to false conclusions. Even if Stahl is eventually confirmed with a Drum 350 it will just be a coincidence using your comparison.