11-14-2012, 04:37 PM
|
 |
M@tt McC@rthy
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 1,485
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott
I got that, and I'm still not going there (with names)
Edited to add - overall, the nuances, numbers, etc., of the t205 set have not been discussed in near as much detail as t206's (even relative to the popularity, collectibility of the two sets);i.e-overall, T206 collectors have been much more willing to share their set's secrets. This isn't a negative comment on any T205 collectors, it's simply what I've noticed. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong - it's still not meant to be demeaning of anyone so I don't see the problem with me stating this opinion.
|
No need to apologize, Scott...I agree. T206 posts grossly outnumber t205 posts and check out the b/s/t...very few for sale. There's a fraction of the information on t205s versus what's out there for t206s...
__________________
M@tt McC@arthy
I collect Hal Chase, Diamond Stars (PSA 5 or better), 1951 Bowman (Raw Ex or better), 1954 Topps (PSA 7 or better), 1956 Topps (Raw Ex or better), 3x5 Hall of Fame Autographs and autographed Perez Steele Postcards. You can see my collection by going to http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BigSix.
|