Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   PSA slabs a Hank Aaron reprint (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=358535)

Peter_Spaeth 02-24-2025 08:48 AM

PSA slabs a Hank Aaron reprint
 
Presented without comment.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/365418261041

npa589 02-24-2025 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2498944)
Presented without comment.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/365418261041


Lol. Wow. This is up there with one of the most egregious mistakes I have ever seen with TPG.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

raulus 02-24-2025 09:03 AM

Never get cheated!

bk400 02-24-2025 09:07 AM

Goodness. It literally says "JALFCO Reprint 1988" on the back.

BobbyStrawberry 02-24-2025 09:27 AM

Has anyone told Rick?

DeanH3 02-24-2025 09:27 AM

It’s a good thing they’ve tightened their grading standards.

OhioLawyerF5 02-24-2025 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2498953)
Has anyone told Rick?

It looks like it, since he already changed the listing title.

BobbyStrawberry 02-24-2025 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5 (Post 2498956)
It looks like it, since he already changed the listing title.

I wonder what will happen at the authentication stage if this ends up being sold.

Peter_Spaeth 02-24-2025 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2498953)
Has anyone told Rick?

It's right in his title.

BobbyStrawberry 02-24-2025 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2498959)
It's right in his title.

Right, I missed that initially. (As did 3 bidders and 12 watchers, apparently...)

Peter_Spaeth 02-24-2025 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2498964)
Right, I missed that initially. (As did 3 bidders and 12 watchers, apparently...)

Or they're buying it for the novelty? Crazy.

oldjudge 02-24-2025 09:54 AM

It did get an extra half point for appearance--can't argue with that. 🤮

brianp-beme 02-24-2025 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bk400 (Post 2498949)
Goodness. It literally says "JALFCO Reprint 1988" on the back.

Yeah, but to be fair to the grader of this card, you have to read a lot of other text on the back before you get to the reprint notice.


Brian

Balticfox 02-24-2025 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2498944)
PSA slabs a Hank Aaron reprint

It's what they do. That's their business model. You present a card, they slab it with a number, you pay to get the card returned, case closed. It then is what it is, i.e a slabbed card with a number on it, for most buyers.

;)

bnorth 02-24-2025 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2498965)
Or they're buying it for the novelty? Crazy.

I can guarantee the guy with the highest bid now wants it as a novelty.:D

Brent G. 02-24-2025 11:20 AM

I suppose if PSA took the time to do everything right, your common submission would take 6 months instead of 3. God knows they won't hire more people to reduce the burden and improve service -- that isn't the Modern American Way.

perezfan 02-24-2025 02:01 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Maybe PSA will approach the winning bidder with a free membership and some party favors like they did with this one...

brewing 02-24-2025 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perezfan (Post 2499067)
Maybe PSA will approach the winning bidder with a free membership and some party favors like they did with this one...

That Mack Cracker Jack has my vote for biggest mistake.

4815162342 02-24-2025 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brewing (Post 2499089)
That Mack Cracker Jack has my vote for biggest mistake.


The T206 Heinie that was slabbed a Honus gets my vote. I wish I would’ve saved a scan years ago when it was for sale on eBay.

bnorth 02-24-2025 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brewing (Post 2499089)
That Mack Cracker Jack has my vote for biggest mistake.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4815162342 (Post 2499100)
The T206 Heinie that was slabbed a Honus gets my vote. I wish I would’ve saved a scan years ago when it was for sale on eBay.

I still vote for the PSA 8 Wagner as the worst.:)

nat 02-24-2025 05:45 PM

It's weird; except for the novelty bidders, this is an auction for money. The PSA guarantee is worth far more than a reprint, so, again, unless you're doing it for the novelty factor, the thing to do if you win this auction is to call in the PSA guarantee (assuming that they honor it). Which means that you should expect the auction to end at whatever the guarantee for this card is.

bnorth 02-24-2025 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nat (Post 2499137)
It's weird; except for the novelty bidders, this is an auction for money. The PSA guarantee is worth far more than a reprint, so, again, unless you're doing it for the novelty factor, the thing to do if you win this auction is to call in the PSA guarantee (assuming that they honor it). Which means that you should expect the auction to end at whatever the guarantee for this card is.

As a novelty bidder I pushed it to the current price. $20 shipped for a cool PSA error was my limit as I had no plans for trying to get PSA to honor anything.

aconte 02-24-2025 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nat (Post 2499137)
It's weird; except for the novelty bidders, this is an auction for money. The PSA guarantee is worth far more than a reprint, so, again, unless you're doing it for the novelty factor, the thing to do if you win this auction is to call in the PSA guarantee (assuming that they honor it). Which means that you should expect the auction to end at whatever the guarantee for this card is.


The guarantee is out the window on mechanical label errors which is what they
will claim.

darwinbulldog 02-24-2025 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2498957)
I wonder what will happen at the authentication stage if this ends up being sold.

There will be no authentication. That's only after the $250 threshold.

BobbyStrawberry 02-24-2025 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darwinbulldog (Post 2499181)
There will be no authentication. That's only after the $250 threshold.

14 bids and 20 watchers...if enough of them think it's real it could reach that threshold. (Certainly at least some of them are missing the fact that it's a reprint, right?)

bk400 02-24-2025 07:25 PM

Since this thread was started a few hours ago, over 500 people have viewed the listing on ebay.

frankbmd 02-24-2025 07:31 PM

Hey Kids,

Reading the back, the card will be punched when redeemed for a prize.

I imagine if the card had been punched, either

a) it wouldn't have received the same grade or

b) the grader would have lost his reserved parking in the PSA lot.:D

OhioLawyerF5 02-24-2025 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2499187)
14 bids and 20 watchers...if enough of them think it's real it could reach that threshold. (Certainly at least some of them are missing the fact that it's a reprint, right?)

It's an interesting question. My understanding is that ebay authentication does 2 things with graded cards. They authenticate the slab itself to verify it wasn't tampered with, and they verify the item matches the description. But they don't re-authenticate the card within the slab at all (like they would for a raw card). So my guess is that since the description is accurate and the slab has not been tampered with, it would pass. But it's a weird situation where the description is different from what's on the slab, but references that the label is an error.

BobbyStrawberry 02-28-2025 03:56 PM

Now up to $46 and 24 watchers.

Gary Dunaier 03-02-2025 06:22 PM

As of date and time of posting, it's gotten 18 bids and is now at $100. 30 people are watching it.

Are these reprints collectors' items in their own right? COMC has an unslabbed copy on eBay, also identified as a reprint, for which they're asking $56.89 as a "Buy It Now."

Rich Klein 03-02-2025 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Dunaier (Post 2500729)
As of date and time of posting, it's gotten 18 bids and is now at $100. 30 people are watching it.

Are these reprints collectors' items in their own right? COMC has an unslabbed copy on eBay, also identified as a reprint, for which they're asking $56.89 as a "Buy It Now."

FYI - COMC are not the people setting the asking price, the submitters are and frankly what price they set a card for sale as is the submitter's business. To me, a person has a right at COMC, on EBay, at a show, at a store, or even on a place like the Net 54 B/S/T to ask what they want for a card. The consumer/collector has the right to say yes, to try to negotiate a price or to say it's a museum piece and I have not a shred at interest at that price level,

Rich.

NiceDocter 03-02-2025 09:21 PM

Oh my gosh
 
Just hammered for $730 plus $5 shipping and tax!!!! What’s the odds this transaction actually is completed? Crazy…….

BobbyStrawberry 03-02-2025 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiceDocter (Post 2500789)
Just hammered for $730 plus $5 shipping and tax!!!! What’s the odds this transaction actually is completed? Crazy…….

Looks like it will head to "authentication" after all.

Tabe 03-02-2025 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bnorth (Post 2499104)
I still vote for the PSA 8 Wagner as the worst.:)

It ain't a mistake if it is intentional :)

darwinbulldog 03-04-2025 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2500791)
Looks like it will head to "authentication" after all.

Aye. I stand corrected.

Fred 03-04-2025 08:03 AM

What's the problem? So PSA forgot to add the text "Jalfco Reprint" on the label. Sheesh, everyone makes mistakes. :p:eek:

.
.
.
.

Cliff Bowman 03-04-2025 09:05 AM

If PSA is smart then they are the ones who bought it.

darwinbulldog 03-04-2025 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman (Post 2501085)
If PSA is smart then they are the ones who bought it.

If

bnorth 03-04-2025 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman (Post 2501085)
If PSA is smart then they are the ones who bought it.

That seems the dumbest to me. Why wouldn't they just deactivate the cert # and say it is a mechanical error and will correct that for free. Then the buyer is out some cash and hopefully learns a valuable lesson.

darwinbulldog 03-04-2025 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bnorth (Post 2501093)
That seems the dumbest to me. Why wouldn't they just deactivate the cert # and say it is a mechanical error and will correct that for free. Then the buyer is out some cash and hopefully learns a valuable lesson.

namely "Never get cheated."


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 AM.