![]() |
T206 Crawford w/ Bat -- Uniquely Jumbo?
I learned how great a player Sam Crawford was after reading an article somewhere about Ty Cobb (his teammate), and I started looking at his T206 cards, specifically the w/ bat pose. Is it me, or do Crawford's w/ bat cards tend to be more jumbo (larger borders) than most other T206s (and I believe this to be true regardless of back). Any thoughts on this?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Lots of tendencies for certain cards to have larger borders because they were at the top of the sheets.
The ones I find interesting are the wide border cards. Mullen batting is one with a lot of examples. You can't really tell just looking at it but if you put it in a stack of cards, it's very pronounced. Attachment 270462 |
agreed on the Mullin batting, I had one in a stack of 15 cards last night and noticed it was wider than all of the others. Perhaps it is on the edge of the sheet? I'll post photo later when I get home.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
if you could travel back in time 30-40 years, you'd be astounded at how many t206s you see with huge borders.
|
Quote:
Tom C |
1 Attachment(s)
I bought t206's when I was a kid and it seemed like most had fat/wide white borders like the Young picture attached. However I have noticed the same trend recently with Crawford batting
|
2 Attachment(s)
In my experience, the 3 poses that turn up most often with wide borders are Mullin with bat, Crawford with bat, and Bender no trees.
I bought this one recently just because the borders are possibly the widest I've seen so far. Ironically, my blank back (which is hand-cut) is wider than it is tall. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 AM. |