![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
EDIT: Peter had my back. Thanks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The one true statement he made was that we will hold him responsible.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Card is gone, disregard my pm :)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://photos.imageevent.com/exhibi...ong%20jack.gif Yes, I have a new favorite GIF and yes I am ten years old...WTF do you expect, I play with baseball cards. |
I think he's just rolling the dice at a casino, right? ;-)
|
1914 Cracker Jack James Scott
Everyone take a look at the 14 Cracker Jack James Scott in the current auction graded a PSA 5. The same exact card sold as a PSA 4 in January. Exact same card but now this PSA 5 has an above average 30% eye appeal? And on top of that the PSA 4 was graded awhile back when PSA was much more lenient. I highly doubt it’s just a grade bump from a review.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The thing is, if PSA has graded a card as a "6", and I sell it as a "PSA 6", how have I done anything illegal? If I know the card used to be a PSA 4, and it is now a PSA 6, how have I done anything illegal? Cards are routinely resubmitted and regraded constantly, with different grades; how do I determine which grade is correct? Answer is, I go by PSA's latest opinion. Now, if I take a PSA 4 card, remove it from the holder, alter it, and then resubmit it to PSA, and PSA regrades it as a 6, how is that illegal? There is no law prohibiting it. PSA's "policy" is that certain alterations would preclude that card from getting a numerical grade; while some alterations are perfectly acceptable. That is only PSA's internal "policy" though; it is not codified in law. If it is now a PSA 6, and I sell it as such, that is not illegal. Beckett grades "sheet-cut" cards. PSA doesn't. If I get an uncut sheet of 1979 Topps hockey, and cut the Gretzky out of it, and submit it to Beckett, they'll grade it. If I send it to PSA, they say in their "policy", that they won't grade it. But say in this instance, PSA grades the card as a 10; and I in turn, sell it as a PSA 10. How is that illegal? It is legal. Some collectors may not like it, but there is nothing "illegal" about it. Steve |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
C. The SGC grader was having a bad day, was in a bad mood, and/or, thought he saw something that wasn't there, and graded the card lower than it deserved. Steve |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But Brent was asked multiple times which branch of law enforcement he is working with. Has he provided an answer? Is it the FBI, Local Police, State Police, Internet Police? Or perhaps it’s the branch of law enforcement OJ used to find the Real Killer. Perhaps we shouldn’t set our hopes too high. :( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is more than plausible. Several years ago, I bought a raw 1910-era HOFer tobacco card from a very well known and respected member of these boards, and auction house owner. The seller is extremely knowledgeable about tobacco cards. I sent it in to PSA. They said it was "trimmed", and returned it to me unslabbed. I contacted the seller, and he assured me the card was completely original and un-tampered with. I believed him. I checked the card myself, and found absolutely no signs of tampering. A couple years later, I resubmitted the card to PSA, and they graded it a "4". I still have it. Both Net54 and the CU message boards are full of posts from people who have submitted cards, only for them to come back to them either ungraded, or with low grades. The common term used is that the cards were looked at by the G.O.D., or "Grader of Death". That is just considering cards that were graded multiple times by the same company. There are even more instances regarding cards originally graded by one company, and then sent to one of the other TPGs, where they received differing grades. That can simply be caused by differing standards between the two TPGs, but could also be related to an overly harsh first-look. Steve |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
“We understand that we are responsible for our part in this mess.”
Damm. That’s a wonderful trial exhibit after Brent gets up and denies all responsibility. Trial lawyers dream about stuff like that. |
Quote:
(But I guess that carries a bit of default risk) |
Quote:
I'm quoting this. Literally cant belive what I'm reading. You've been cheerleading for PWCC all along. Stuff trumps all, and it couldnt happen to a better rube. As Bozo would say " juuuuust keeeeeep bidding" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
UN'beliveable Sleep with dogs and you'll get fleas brutha Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk |
1 Attachment(s)
BO has a tweet from Brent claiming he just learned about Moser, as I read it.
https://www.blowoutforums.com/showpo...&postcount=478 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Apparently Mr Comsevation has issued another statement where he flips on Moser. Anybody have the link to it?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Maybe he's going with a mental health defense?
|
Quote:
|
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EMSoRMT9d...hdad%2Bbob.jpg
I mean, why is he still talking? He still thinks he can convince people of his inward virtue. |
Quote:
I’ve been looking for it but can’t find it either - May be part of a piece written by one of the news sources, or maybe it’s just not there |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Rovell on Twitter
1 Attachment(s)
Wow
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
This a crying shame. I don’t think there can be more than a handful of these out there, and now there is evidence that one of these beauties has been tainted. While no alteration is acceptable, some cards should be untouchable (pun intended)
|
Now working to regain your trust.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So I suppose if I had stuck to denying that mass murders of children in schools never happened or that 911 was a conspiracy and it never happened I would not have received 3 minutes in the box?
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
What happens to the Moser cards, and other altered cards, once they are uncovered and returned to PWCC (or PSA or whoever) for refund? Will they be destroyed? I mean its just an altered card, they're not forgeries or anything, and in some cases might be rare and still hold significant value, even as an altered card
|
For all the talk of legal vs illegal, the main takeaway for me from all of this is that I can't and won't trust anything in Brent's auctions ever again.
Jason Schwartz Chicago, IL |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
For those that bought as pure investment, they might not want to give up those cards. It would be a break even. What's to keep them from holding onto the cards a couple years for this to all blow over and then turning a profit?
|
Quote:
http://www.philatelicfoundation.org/...and-forgeries/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
After reading all of this I have a concern that I have not seen anyone address. What happens if/when people stop trusting PSA as THE grading company? That is where everyone with a PSA slabbed card will take a hit. Lets just say even a small amount of people start second guessing PSA cards. That might be a few less bidders on your items or maybe your buy it now listing does not sell at the price you want. That is where the real damage can occur. Think about if the value of PSA slabbed cards just drops a little bit over this situation. That could be millions in lost value in small increments. This effect can go way beyond the altered cards in question.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:08 AM. |