![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
There's nothing better in life when a Net54 member has an issue with another Net54 member and that other Net54 member comes on here to explain their side. Oh hell yeah.
Attachment 653191Attachment 653191Attachment 653191Attachment 653191Attachment 653191 |
This is how BST typically works well (I’m not a lawyer, nor play one on TV, so this is not legal advice, and all are welcome to correct any errors or omissions):
1. Seller posts card, description, price, and statement: ‘I’ll take it’ supersedes all ongoing discussions (there’s good reason some post this disclaimer). 2. Potential Buyer posts reply to listing or PMs Seller: ‘I’ll take it.’ 3. Seller PMs the potential Buyer either that a sale is already pending and thus their ‘I’ll take it’ is unfortunately declined, or the payment method details if they’re 1st in queue, asks Buyer to make payment in a specified time period to lock in the deal, as well as asks for Buyer’s email, shipping carrier preference, and address. Good faith assumption is made by Seller that payment will be made by the potential Buyer from their ‘I’ll take it’ post, regardless of whether or not they hear back from potential Buyer before #5 below. Potential Buyer makes good faith assumption they will be sold the card if Seller responds to them and doesn’t explicitly decline their ‘I’ll take it’ reply. 4. Potential Buyer PMs the Seller asap with requested info from #3 and notes when payment will be made and cleared. 5. Seller replies ‘Sale Pending’ to their listing. Anyone else in BST replying they’ll take it, or on any other platform tries to claim it takes their respective place in the potential Buyer queue. 6. Potential Buyer makes payment and once cleared becomes the rightful owner by transfer of their property (money) for Seller’s property (advertised card). 7. Seller confirms Buyer’s payment clears their bank, completing part 1 in the transfer of property. Then replies ‘Sold’ to their listing. 8. Buyer PMs the Seller their email, shipping carrier preference, and address to Seller. 9. Seller emails pics of the card to the Buyer in current state and time stamped, pics in its secured packaging, then ships the card to Buyer. Seller then PMs and/or emails the shipping tracking info to the Buyer. Both monitor shipping status and keep lines of communication open as needed. 10. Card arrives to Buyer and part 2 in the transfer of property is complete. |
Quote:
|
On the conceptual issue, I have never had a real issue in any forum's BST and it's not difficult. Transactions have been smooth and easy almost every single time I've sold on a forum from giving away cheap stuff for free to ~$10K deals. If I'm worried about it I do, adapted from my 'get-out-of-jail-free' clause from another hobby where discretion is more important, throw in a line at the end that I reserve the right to decline to do business with any person for any reason or no reason, so that I don't have to be 'obligated' to deal with someone who I am suspicious is going to try and make an issue or I suspect is going to be needlessly difficult. Whether one sells to the first "I will take it" or to the first responder who wants to talk about it, both are reasonable and not worth great thought or hand wringing. It is really not difficult to do basic transactions without drama. Although the dramatic meltdowns and frivolous imaginary lawsuits is a lot of fun when I'm not in the transaction.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I may be wrong, but I don't see how you can find my personal information thru Net54 with one click. And I'm not paranoid about being breached - I just don't think that buying/selling on the BST should require me to share with everyone my address, paypal, etc. which your plan requires unless I'm mistaken. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This conversation probably isn't worth the bother but it's a nice break from number crunching for fantasy baseball prep. |
Quote:
This place is for sharing. "Privacy" is not belonging to social media, which this is a form of. |
Quote:
It is definitely hard to stay anonymous online, especially as you get older. There are just too many things that end up having to be done online (or are just so much more convenient and easy to do online) that eventually, some amount of personal information becomes available. |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
John1941 net54 try a Google search. Everything you posted in will show up. I screen shot a few things for you. Attachment 653199 Attachment 653200 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Actually, it's even easier than that. Just click on their username and a window pops up that gives you the option to Find all posts by xxxx |
Quote:
Theme to Perry Mason - if you don't know what that is, then don't bother playing it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpdQ0kRC5dk . . . . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This bolded in the header at the top of the page, and it say quote: If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. |
Quote:
But when it comes to burner accounts, those are definitely not allowed around here under the existing rules, and will even get you banned PDQ. So that solution is DOA. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here: "Anonymous, where this board is concerned, implies that you are not known to the moderator or anyone else. That is not permitted on Net54baseball. However, you may remain private on the board; otherwise, as long your post is not argumentative, controversial, confrontational, accusatorial etc.…For example you can discuss attributes of cards, sets or memorabilia and stay private. You can not say someone is an imbecile, hard to deal with, gave poor service etc…and remain private on the board. In addition to that if your opinion is that you dislike someone, hate them, can’t stand or don’t like anything about them, and you want to tell the world about it on Net54baseball, then your full name will need to be in your post." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Chad, if it's so easy to know everything about me, what is my last name exactly? And if you can't tell me my name in three days you'll have to give me your first-born child. Rumplestiltskin rules. |
Vintage Vern, who had an over the top tantrum similar to the OP of this thread because he didn't get a card he wanted just recently, trying to redesign the B/S/T, scold John who is a great guy and more mature than most of us adults and doesn't make controversial posts, over forum rules and trying to track him online to find his address and last name to prove a tiny point nobody cares about is just the cherry on top to this thread. Hilarious.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
LOL, yes I'm scolding a person by pointing out how easy it is for us on this private site to be worried about publicly stating "I want it" vs doing so by DM. You caught the Tater! I hate to break it to you, but board rules are for all, and even the great guys have to follow them. |
Quote:
Also, I have no idea what you're talking about with "signing up to see my full account" and paying 19 bucks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cobb/Wagner
I will take it
|
Quote:
That's the reasoning behind wanting to use the DM vs the original post in BST to buy items, and how many want to stay incognito. I was then linked a post Showing your collections/room off to others by if im not mistaken John. which was kind of funny. It pops up on Google, and so did everyone and everything posted. Even the people that wouldn't show people, just actually showed people. If your name, and location are on your posts along with your bio, what you collect, what your looking for, who you've had the pleasure of buying or selling to, and from. Yes, we can be found out easily from people not even here on the board. I didn’t look for John, I said I could if that was my want, and desire. Its not, but many of us aren't hard to gather info on to those that want to. John's last name isn't at this time listed, but a simple board search shows he's dodged the bullet so far, because the email I received has exactly what I posted, and what is bolded at the top of each page. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This thread has it all. Baseless lawsuits, last word freaks, estalking and everything in between. My bag of popcorn is empty, but the thread just keeps on giving.
IMO this is how every card deal should go down for some comic relief. In super serious times of dodging bullets and very serious lawsuits. https://www.tiktok.com/@altxyzoffici...31260587412778 |
Quote:
Oh boy. Do you understand everything you have here can put you on the map? Did you not link to a blog you post to in your bio? Since I don't belong I have no idea what info you linked nor do I care others may go that direction to help link info to you. I'm stating each part you add is a piece of the puzzle for someone online to link to you. It may actually hold your name or family members or any other part of your so called private life. Just so you understand for about 20 bucks I can find out almost everything about anyone I want, and so can you. I showed a friend of mine how easy I could find his elderly parents and sibling, and it took me no money, and about 5 minutes. He was shocked I could find his parents so easily. Their ages, first names, addresses, ages, family members, and neighbors. He was shocked because they had no online accounts or today's gadgets. Anyone can do this with little information. I'm simply trying to point out, we can be found, and the link you posted to "Showing your collections/room off to others" is on Google for all to see. That's all it takes. Many have both their names, and locations, "ones that don't show off their collections as well". Yet they do, and don't even know it. Some even mentioned their security systems and guns. Yet some think saying, I'll take it on the BST post is blasphemy vs doing so via DM. That was the proof that was given to me about how people don't want to show what they have. Many people do it without even knowing they're doing it by simply posting day after day. |
That was entertaining reading.
Regardless of which side you're on regarding the actual card sale, the "I'll see you in court" line is just a classic. I'd love to see an actual lawyer laugh this "case" out of their office. ;):D |
Quote:
I like both Cody and Jonathan a lot, sorry this happened. There is at least one person frequently posting to this thread who I wish would get banned from the site, though. Doug "I badmouthed somebody, so here's my full name" Goodman |
The reason full names are asked for in these situations
Go back to the very old Full Count Board days (pre-Net 54) where that message board dissolved into a morass of name calling and the focus on vintage cards went away.
The rule, and it is in my opinion, is the posting of a real name if you make certain comments is one which has made this board stronger because if you say something you are, in a way, asked to back it up instead of just typing where no one knows who you are. John, on this one, you frankly don't have a leg to stand on and there are ways to disguise your name with a symbol here and there. There are people on the board who do that which does help prevent the google searches. Look at how Vintage Vern and Brent G did their names as examples. Regards Rich Who has always posted with his name on this board |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here is your MO, turn what you do to others back on them and then play the victim, and whine about others. Every thread you're involved in you do the exact same thing, and turn it into anything but constructive dialog. Your go to is everyone throws a tantrum, gaslighting them, and twisting others words to fit your narrative, and turning the dialog into something it wasn't. Congrats. Posts 125,131,132,134,140, 152 a very important one, then comes post 163 then post 166 when confusion starts and I try to show a person how nieve they are up to the point you again stick your nose in on my posts without an invite. Here's the kicker post 167 someone else pointed him in the right direction to what I was alluding to yet it kept going becausehe couldn't grasp something simple. Even after post 171. 173 was there to show how he has actually broken the rule of having a full name applied which he would then be exposed, by what I'm saying all of us are exposed to. Reason being, he claimed he did no such thing for needing his full name here. Actually untrue. Not that I care or need to keep explaining myself to you or others that don't follow what is being relayed in honest dialog. |
1 Attachment(s)
Please....
|
If an advanced alien civilization read some of these recent threads as an example of our civilization, they’d definitely just pass us by.
|
Quote:
|
This thread still has 5000+ fewer views than the previous recent etiquette thread. :eek:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Approximately 3-4 yrs ago, a major auction house (and advertiser) employee was shilling his own companies auctions, anonymously.That is when the rule changed and he and I had a chat about it. Edit....The FAQs on the forum have now been updated and shortened a little bit. ... Anonymous, where this board is concerned, implies that you are not known to the moderator or anyone else. That is not permitted on Net54baseball. If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. Members can discuss attributes of cards, sets or memorabilia and stay private.The moderator may put the members name on the forum or delete their posts, at their sole discretion, when this rule is not adhered to. Tense debates will require first and last names to be known, and made public. Names can be scrambled to be unsearchable, but they must be decipherable. Contact information will be given out for legal reasons or under extraordinary circumstances at the discretion of the moderator.. There are no age requirements on the forum however, you must be 18 years of age to participate in the Buy, Sell, Trade areas, or have a parent or legal guardian contact the moderator for approval first. Registered members may also receive periodic, infrequent, industry related emails. Members may opt out of these by clicking the unsubscribe button.[/B] . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
used to be show called name that tune..
people could name a tune in 5 notes unless the contestant could believe they could name it in less based on a few hints. for this post...the whole conflict could of been solved in under 20 posts...and all of the issues expressed ..... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He chose music as his category Rich |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And 13% of the posts you have ever made on net54 are in this thread. 35 posts. I'm tempted to delete this post before I submit it (as referenced in the last post I made to the board) but sometimes I just can't stop myself for pointing out... Doug (sometimes less than a) Goodman |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will admit being wrong when I am shown to be, but I seldom regret my words or deeds. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Don't we need a special FAQ rules section for aliens.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Leon, you and I talked about this many moons ago at the National. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
BST Viewing
Quote:
|
My two cents from a contract law perspective. It appears to me that an important (I.e. “material”) payment term was not included in the seller’s initial BST post. Hence, his initial post was not an offer (which must include all material terms) that could be accepted (to form an actual agreement) with a simple “I will take it.” So seller is free to negotiate with anyone he wants, and sell to the first buyer able to satisfy all material terms. In other words, seller has no obligation to wait for any potential buyers to get back to him.
With all that said, there is a lot of confusion because contract law principles are not being followed on this board. I tried to warn some with my posts in that other thread. For example, some here believe the words “I will take it” seals the deal and binds the parties. That’s not always the case. The key is the wording on the seller’s initial post. Does it leave out any material terms? If so, it’s not an offer. It’s an invitation to negotiate, and the buyer who is fastest to complete the deal gets the prize. EDIT: for the layman, a term is “material” in a contract when it’s a condition that if not met, is a deal breaker for either party. |
Any succesful lawsuits against ebay sellers and their "pricing mistakes"? If so, it could lead to a precedent, without it, I doubt anyone would feel obligated to keep their word, even if over a few lousy bucks.
|
Quote:
You should post these legal critiques directly in BST threads. “This transaction between hobby friends violates contract law principles!” Cue Debbie Downer and the muted trombone. |
Quote:
|
Sadly for me, the stuff I post for sale isn’t in demand enough to spark legal arguments by prospective buyers, over who gets to buy it and who doesn’t. :(
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 PM. |