Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Now that all the lying is done...do you think clemens makes the hall? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=152712)

calvindog 06-20-2012 08:13 PM

David, all Pettite had to do was be consistent either with the truth or his lies. He wasn't. He told the truth once and lied another time. It's not like he was consistently covering for his friend.

Mikehealer 06-20-2012 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy (Post 1005719)
Lying doesn't mean that he's not a stand up guy.

That's exactly what it means.

vintagetoppsguy 06-20-2012 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikehealer (Post 1005747)
That's exactly what it means.

Mike, have you ever told a lie? Are you a stand up guy?

Mikehealer 06-20-2012 08:45 PM

I have. I am not.

packs 06-20-2012 09:26 PM

I can't see myself knowingly putting the nail in my friend's perjury case and sending them to jail. I would say I wasn't sure I remembered too.

Jlighter 06-20-2012 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy (Post 1005748)
Mike, have you ever told a lie? Are you a stand up guy?

Did Mike ever commit perjury.

packs 06-20-2012 09:37 PM

I think Andy is a stand up guy for taking responsibility for his own actions.

vintagetoppsguy 06-20-2012 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jlighter (Post 1005775)
Did Mike ever commit perjury.

I guessing the answer is no. Then again, according to the jury, Roger Clemens didn't either.

HRBAKER 06-20-2012 09:47 PM

Then I will respectfully disagree as well.
I do not believe most people would lie under oath.
And of course I am not sure that Bill Clinton is the standard to judge what most people would do either. Case not closed.

teetwoohsix 06-20-2012 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikehealer (Post 1005754)
I have. I am not.

To the second part of this reply, I disagree. IMO you are a stand up guy.

It's interesting that a jury acquited him but many people still think he's a liar. I know the jury doesn't always get it right (OJ) but I don't see the compeling evidence-maybe I'm missing something.

Look at early cards of Bonds- skinny as a beanpole. Years later, looks like a tank. I didn't see Clemens looking like that, maybe that's why I'm not convinced. And, this Mac guy holding on to a syringe for all of these years? Sounds strange to me.

Sincerely, Clayton

teetwoohsix 06-20-2012 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy (Post 1005737)
I disagree. I think most would lie under oath if it meant saving their own butt or someone else's (as long as the lie didn't hurt anybody else). Just look at Bill Clinton. He held the highest office in the country and lied under oath. Case closed!

Good point- and what a coincidence- she happened to save and not wash the dress :D (evidence). Sort of like the syringe......

vintagetoppsguy 06-20-2012 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teetwoohsix (Post 1005795)
Look at early cards of Bonds- skinny as a beanpole. Years later, looks like a tank. I didn't see Clemens looking like that, maybe that's why I'm not convinced. And, this Mac guy holding on to a syringe for all of these years? Sounds strange to me.

Very good points. No, Clemens never grew in size like Bonds (and others) did. Also, look at Clemens' career stats. Each year was pretty consistent and never showed an improvement in his numbers. Last, why would Mac hold on to a syringe and cotton balls all those years? Makes no sense. And where was the syringe and cotton balls kept all those years? In a freaking beer can!

drc 06-20-2012 11:35 PM

I don't think either Mussina or Pettitte were good enough to get into the Hall. Of the two, Mussina was superior. Pettitte has a lifetime 3.86 ERA, regularly had ERAs over 4, and had the W-L success only because he played for the Yankees.

Ozzie Smith deserves to be in the Hall because he was the best defensive player at the most important defensive position-- and possibly the best defensive player in history. The Hall takes way too little notice to defense, but not in this case. If you're focusing on Ozzie's home run total, you're missing the point.

glynparson 06-21-2012 08:13 AM

found innocent?
 
First of he was not found innocent. People are not found innocent in criminal trials he was found not guilty based on the evidence the jury was allowed to consider. this is in no way the same thing as being found innocent of the crime he was alleged to do.

bbcard1 06-21-2012 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by murcerfan (Post 1005432)
the real question here is why our "broke" federal government is spending money on these witch hunts.

Because most congressmen are jock sniffers with egos that make superstar baseball players look like Mother Teresa?

Texxxx 06-21-2012 12:43 PM

My god, what a witch hunt!!

Lordstan 06-21-2012 03:25 PM

Not mine, but humorous.

http://www.net54baseball.com/picture...pictureid=7043


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM.