NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2020, 08:58 PM
investinrookies investinrookies is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 329
Default 1914 Cracker Jack Color Variations?

Seeking some insight on what seems to be some degree of color variations on these particularly with the red color of the background. There appears to be some that have more of a deeper red than others and some with an overall orange/red background. I’ve noticed the orange/red version on a few of the mattys in particular. Heres an example below. I’ve also seen it on unaltered versions to suggest it’s not a result of cleaning.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last edited by investinrookies; 11-15-2020 at 09:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2020, 05:53 AM
Casey2296's Avatar
Casey2296 Casey2296 is offline
Is Mudville so bad?
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,727
Default

I've noticed that too and always assumed it was fading, but looking at your Matty example if that was the case then the black should be a little more faded also. A quick check of the 14 CJ's on eBay shows several cards with the red/orange background. One explanation might be a different red ink formulation used on different printing runs. It may have looked like the same red at time of printing but contained a pigment or filler that became fugitive over time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2020, 06:08 AM
investinrookies investinrookies is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 329
Default

that's the thing, the black on the Matty is really dark, actually darker than most of my others, especially from the back.

Last edited by investinrookies; 11-16-2020 at 06:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2020, 06:27 AM
tiger8mush's Avatar
tiger8mush tiger8mush is offline
Rob G.
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,034
Default

This one has a pink/magenta tone to it ...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 139_Oakes_(2553).jpg (76.4 KB, 165 views)
__________________
Collection on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139478047@N03/albums
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2020, 08:49 AM
t206fanatic's Avatar
t206fanatic t206fanatic is offline
Jeff Willi@ms
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 299
Default

This is the "pinkest" one in my collection -- always has looked a little, off.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fisher f545.jpg (77.8 KB, 144 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2020, 09:19 AM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,099
Default

Black inks were often colored with carbon, and shouldn't fade.

Red generally will fade with light exposure, but at the time there were competing red pigments. Some of them were more colorfast than others.

The exact color was also mixed by hand starting with a base color and adding small amounts of others to adjust it to exactly what was wanted. And if the pressman was slightly short of base or ran low adding a little of something could extend the existing ink just enough to finish the days work (Or shift)
But of course, if you put in too much white, or extend with a tiny bit of white your red will be lighter.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-17-2020, 06:06 AM
toledo_mudhen's Avatar
toledo_mudhen toledo_mudhen is offline
Lonnie Nagel
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: St. Joe, Missouri
Posts: 1,354
Default

OT BUT - This one comes back as a 3 - Owner obviously not happy. Description states he talked to grader and the 3 is the result of "caramel stains"?

I was thinking that pretty much ALL of these are stained to some degree.

Is the 3 not an unusually harsh grade on this?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1914-CRACKE...UAAOSwT~lfsHx~
__________________
Lonnie Nagel
T206 : 172/520 : 32.8%
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-17-2020, 06:43 AM
oldeboo oldeboo is offline
Trey
Tr.ey Bu0y
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toledo_mudhen View Post
OT BUT - This one comes back as a 3 - Owner obviously not happy. Description states he talked to grader and the 3 is the result of "caramel stains"?

I was thinking that pretty much ALL of these are stained to some degree.

Is the 3 not an unusually harsh grade on this?

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1914-CRACKE...UAAOSwT~lfsHx~
Company line for cards distributed with messy products. An anonymous numerical grade from a stranger means absolutely nothing when evaluating cards like the 1914 CJs or Polar Bear T205/T206 as examples. I have a strong preference for caramel stains and even bits of scrap tobacco stuck to Polar Bear cards. With that said, PSA is all over the place when it comes to nuances to issues like these, one of their evaluators would call that a 6-7 and another a 2-3. That card should be valued in the 6 range all day long IMO. That looks darn near freshly pulled from a CJ box, let's be honest.

Last edited by oldeboo; 11-17-2020 at 06:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2020, 03:02 PM
Kidnapped18's Avatar
Kidnapped18 Kidnapped18 is offline
Ton.y Be.ll
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Alabama
Posts: 390
Default

I agree this card visually looks much better than a PSA 3 so a re-submit is not totally out of the question. $25,000 is a bit too steep for me personally even for this good looking card. The only '14 CJs I'm paying $25,000+ for are Cobbs, Mattys and Shoeless Joes.

PSA is all over the place when it comes to stains on this issue. They have labeled some cards with the ST qualifier for the caramel stains and deduct points on others based on the staining. I would agree that stains, other than caramel stains, should be taken into grading consideration but any collector who owns '14 CJs knows that is how they come and that is why we collect them.

Tony

Last edited by Kidnapped18; 11-18-2020 at 03:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-18-2020, 03:04 PM
Kidnapped18's Avatar
Kidnapped18 Kidnapped18 is offline
Ton.y Be.ll
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Alabama
Posts: 390
Default

Duplicate

Last edited by Kidnapped18; 11-19-2020 at 10:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-18-2020, 08:36 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,339
Default

PSA screwed themselves with CJ grades, having changed the way the caramel stains affect the overall grading scale from prior years. There's no consistency anymore with the 1914's. It's a total shit show
__________________
A.J. Johnson
https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39
*Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished the 1914 Cracker Jack set ranked #11 all-time
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: 1914 Cracker Jack Austin, 1914 CJ Knetzer Jacker_ Cracks Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T 0 05-01-2016 10:40 AM
1914 Cracker Jack Adams, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Toole Brian Van Horn Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T 1 02-01-2012 07:19 PM
1914 E145-1 Cracker Jack back variations question fkw Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 08-02-2011 06:24 PM
1914 Cracker Jack Lord, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Neill Brian Van Horn Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T 0 03-11-2011 05:22 PM
Variations in 1914 Cracker Jacks. Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 03-16-2008 02:56 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 AM.


ebay GSB