NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2016, 08:11 AM
Yoda Yoda is offline
Joh.n Spen.cer
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,907
Default Ugliest Set Ever

This is not a light topic, to which I have given considerable thought. After looking at more vomitus cards than I ever cared to, my vote is in: the 1918-20 W-Unc. "Big Head's", a set so crude and ugly that only its' creator could love it. Upon, reflection, though, I don't think 1918 was exactly a banner year for baseball cards, as it was the final year of WWI and collectors probably had few choices. Any other nominations?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2016, 08:18 AM
h2oya311's Avatar
h2oya311 h2oya311 is online now
Derek Granger
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,392
Default

Hands down:

1921 W9316

It looks like they hired a four-year-old to paint the "images" of the players.
__________________
...
http://imageevent.com/derekgranger

HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 244/342 (71.4%)
1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 114/119 (95.8%)
1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate............: 177/180 (98.3%)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-26-2016, 08:23 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,354
Default

E91.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2016, 08:28 AM
bbcard1 bbcard1 is offline
T0dd M@rcum
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,329
Default

Eclipse Imports is tough to beat for ugly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-26-2016, 08:38 AM
mechanicalman's Avatar
mechanicalman mechanicalman is offline
Sam Sw@rtz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h2oya311 View Post
Hands down:

1921 W9316

It looks like they hired a four-year-old to paint the "images" of the players.
+1 Add to the fact that they are hand cut, they are a hot mess.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-26-2016, 08:55 AM
h2oya311's Avatar
h2oya311 h2oya311 is online now
Derek Granger
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mechanicalman View Post
+1 Add to the fact that they are hand cut, they are a hot mess.
by "hand cut", again, usually the work of a four-year-old. I think the more appropriate description for most is "hand torn". There are not too many examples that were "neatly cut".
__________________
...
http://imageevent.com/derekgranger

HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 244/342 (71.4%)
1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 114/119 (95.8%)
1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate............: 177/180 (98.3%)

Last edited by h2oya311; 01-26-2016 at 09:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-26-2016, 10:37 AM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,623
Default An eye for ugly

I've always thought the W512 and W513 strip card sets were pretty darn ugly. But then again, I have at various points collected (except for the Eclipse) all the sets that have been mentioned, so what does that make me? Perhaps a connoisseur of ugly old cards.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-26-2016, 11:05 AM
Joshchisox08's Avatar
Joshchisox08 Joshchisox08 is offline
J0$H B^ck!ey
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: C0nn3cticu+
Posts: 1,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h2oya311 View Post
Hands down:

1921 W9316

It looks like they hired a four-year-old to paint the "images" of the players.
I think I have to concur with this assessment.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%

237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW

Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!

Checklists sold (20)

T205 8/208 3.8%
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-26-2016, 12:09 PM
Rich Klein Rich Klein is offline
Rich Klein
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Plano Tx
Posts: 4,496
Default

1943-49 MP and Company
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-26-2016, 12:30 PM
BeanTown's Avatar
BeanTown BeanTown is offline
Jay Cee
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Klein View Post
1943-49 MP and Company

+1. Everyone has mentioned some pretty ugly sets. I would add the tattoo eclipse proofs!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-26-2016, 01:19 PM
glchen's Avatar
glchen glchen is offline
_G@ґy*€hℯη_
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h2oya311 View Post
Hands down:

1921 W9316

It looks like they hired a four-year-old to paint the "images" of the players.
Another vote for this one. I actually like the Big Head set. It's like they made it that way on purpose, and the Eclipse set is growing on me although I understand why many believe that it looks awful.

Edit: Added some of the ugliest Ruth cards, some mentioned in this thread. The Schutter is often mentioned as an ugy set also, and threw in the ML Die Cut as it's one of those generic player "sets."
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ugly_ruth.jpg (81.6 KB, 288 views)

Last edited by glchen; 01-26-2016 at 01:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-26-2016, 03:17 PM
Fred's Avatar
Fred Fred is offline
Fred
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,013
Default

Hmm, ugliest huh? Here are two issues that are pretty bad but maybe not the "ugliest" when you consider the strip cards and MP&Co cards that are out there:

E91
N284 (with exception of Von der Ahe)

Some of the players look like they are twins in both issues.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something
cool you're looking to find a new home for.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-26-2016, 03:26 PM
Bliggity's Avatar
Bliggity Bliggity is offline
Dan Bl@u
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 929
Default

I know this is heresy in some circles, but..........1975 Topps (since the OP didn't specify prewar).
__________________
Recovering Relapsed set collector.

Last edited by Bliggity; 01-26-2016 at 03:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-26-2016, 03:37 PM
Joshchisox08's Avatar
Joshchisox08 Joshchisox08 is offline
J0$H B^ck!ey
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: C0nn3cticu+
Posts: 1,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bliggity View Post
I know this is heresy in some circles, but..........1975 Topps (since the OP didn't specify prewar).
I always found those quite cool. My dad has a bunch of them so when we were little seeing those appeared to be "old" cards.

I can see how people would find the multi-color borders distracting though.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%

237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW

Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!

Checklists sold (20)

T205 8/208 3.8%
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-26-2016, 03:40 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bliggity View Post
I know this is heresy in some circles, but..........1975 Topps (since the OP didn't specify prewar).
I hate 72 Topps. I don't mind 75 although some of the color combos are rather loud.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg brett.jpg (35.3 KB, 255 views)

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 01-26-2016 at 03:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-26-2016, 05:20 PM
Jeff1970Red Jeff1970Red is offline
Jeff D
member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: So Cal
Posts: 59
Default

Too bad Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Paige, Josh Gibson...didn't have their run of cards like Mantle, Mays or even their predecessors like Cobb, Wagner etc.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-26-2016, 07:26 PM
Section103's Avatar
Section103 Section103 is offline
Rich v@n He$$
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Denver-ish
Posts: 718
Default

A lot of the ones mentioned are definitely bad, but for me Ive always frowned at the T207. Just my opinion and I know some here love them.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-26-2016, 10:10 PM
SMPEP SMPEP is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 880
Default

My first two thoughts when I saw the title of this thread are well represented:

1) M&P

2) Big Heads

The M&Ps have only the faintest resemblance to the actual players, so I give them the win.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-27-2016, 06:47 AM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is offline
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 34,341
Default

Not mine anymore but another vote for w9316 like this Baker...(blank back)

__________________
Leon Luckey
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-27-2016, 08:36 AM
ksabet's Avatar
ksabet ksabet is offline
K!ya S@bet
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 478
Default

T206's
































Just kidding...I understand that could be considered prosecutable hate speech on this board.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-27-2016, 09:34 AM
53Browns's Avatar
53Browns 53Browns is offline
Bill
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 633
Default

That W9316 Baker looks like Eleanor Roosevelt! IMHO -
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ugliest Pre-War card ever ??? Joshchisox08 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 08-25-2015 07:10 AM
ugliest t205 that you have... whelenfan Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 11-17-2014 08:04 PM
What is the UGLIEST... mintacular Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 03-23-2010 06:24 AM
The Ugliest Pre-War Set Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 22 06-02-2007 01:15 PM
Ugliest set ever Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 19 06-22-2003 10:51 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 PM.


ebay GSB