Show...me...your print variations!

[G1911]

I would like to take this moment to apologize to Shane for my past behavior and conduct in discussing variations on cards of players who played for the Cardinals. It is with a heavy heart and great regret for my past conduct that I stand here today, taking responsibility for my cruel and thoughtless actions. Not only did I participate in discussions about variants on Cardinals cards, I went even further into transgression and occasionally shared a new one. I hope that I may some day be forgiven, if not in my time on Earth, then in the next life, but forgiveness is not needed for me to take ownership and admit to the shameful sin I have committed. It will never, ever happen again, maybe. Shane, definitely don’t look at post #2,397.

[butchie_t]

Originally Posted by G1911

I would like to take this moment to apologize to Shane for my past behavior and conduct in discussing variations on cards of players who played for the Cardinals. It is with a heavy heart and great regret for my past conduct that I stand here today, taking responsibility for my cruel and thoughtless actions. Not only did I participate in discussions about variants on Cardinals cards, I went even further into transgression and occasionally shared a new one. I hope that I may some day be forgiven, if not in my time on Earth, then in the next life, but forgiveness is not needed for me to take ownership and admit to the shameful sin I have committed. It will never, ever happen again, maybe. Shane, definitely don’t look at post #2,397.

ROFL.....big time. ROFL.

Honorable man that Greg for owning up to his past transgressions. That is a heartfelt apology too.

And now I gotta go find another 72 variation.




Butch

[ALR-bishop]

Greg is just applying lessons learned from ErikV's pre war thread

[G1911]

Applying lessons learned, since there is no honor to be found in my actions that have contributed to the suffering of a fellow board member's collection. My apology is heartfelt though, and I hope will be taken into consideration at my sentencing. While I have brought shame and disgrace to the variations community, it has been a pleasure, gentlemen

[butchie_t]

Originally Posted by G1911

Applying lessons learned, since there is no honor to be found in my actions that have contributed to the suffering of a fellow board member's collection. My apology is heartfelt though, and I hope will be taken into consideration at my sentencing. While I have brought shame and disgrace to the variations community, it has been a pleasure, gentlemen

I for one am quick to forgive.

Regards,

I found 2 Bob's. Not easy to come by either, but the are out there for sure.

Butch

[G1911]

Originally Posted by butchie_t

I for one am quick to forgive.

Regards,

I found 2 Bob's. Not easy to come by either, but the are out there for sure.

Butch

Thank goodness, for I may need forgiveness very quick here! Shane, look away man

There's a lot of sub variants of the Gibson, one more common one that really only has a white slash through the "I" in "MINOR" and then there's what I think is a tougher one where most of the white streaking is focused over the cartoon's text.

[butchie_t]

I just picked up these two.

Shane, the new guy started it. I am just providing these for historical reference...cough.

Butch

[butchie_t]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Greg is just applying lessons learned from ErikV's pre war thread

Ohhh, it was not lost on me. An excellent example for sure.

Butch

[Tedwilliams1918]

I think for 1972 Gibson a piece of dirt or something got stuck on the print plate and moved around which is why there are soo many different varieties or the variation

[Tedwilliams1918]

.

[Tedwilliams1918]

Just wondering, do any of you guys have sandy with extra sand behind his ear?

[G1911]

I’ve ignored the Koufax sand, because I don’t want to buy another expensive Koufax or two lol. So he sits on my list unchecked off

[Cliff Bowman]

I have no clue on this one, but it is recurring https://www.ebay.com/itm/23224222556...Bk9SR4L6koyfYQ and although the other one is better centered it's priced just a wee bit too steep for me. It looks like the green wasn't printed on the bottom half of the card for some reason, causing the no name error. If the surrounding cards on the uncut sheet were also affected it would seem they would have also shown up by now.

[Tedwilliams1918]

This was topps trial run on 1990 frank Thomas nnof 🤣

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman

I have no clue on this one, but it is recurring https://www.ebay.com/itm/23224222556...Bk9SR4L6koyfYQ and although the other one is better centered it's priced just a wee bit too steep for me. It looks like the green wasn't printed on the bottom half of the card for some reason, causing the no name error. If the surrounding cards on the uncut sheet were also affected it would seem they would have also shown up by now.

This is a really cool one. “A wee bit too steep”, but maybe it’s something not too bad and I could make an offer on. So I click the link. Lol. Lmao.

[savedfrommyspokes]

Originally Posted by Cliff Bowman

It looks like the green wasn't printed on the bottom half of the card for some reason, causing the no name error.

Nice find, I am thinking you meant blue rather than green

[MikeGarcia]

..you may have to squint a little to make it out but I think I've found out the exact size of the 1952 Topps gum piece in the packs. These things bought Buick Roadmasters and Chrysler Imperials for a lot of dentists back in the fifties.

[Cliff Bowman]

Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes

Nice find, I am thinking you meant blue rather than green

The top of the error card obviously has a blue tint, but what I was going by is the long rectangle where his name should be, on the regular card it is green with yellow letters, on the error card it is just yellow.

[Tedwilliams1918]

On this card the more ted the better I believed he touches sid Hudson who also has a similar problem, unfortunately some kid Carried this one in his pocket lol

[ALR-bishop]

Originally Posted by Tedwilliams1918

On this card the more ted the better I believed he touches sid Hudson who also has a similar problem, unfortunately some kid Carried this one in his pocket lol

I saw the Hudson you posted earlier, is that what you are referring to as similar to the Sandlock, or something else

[Tedwilliams1918]

Yea on Hudson but it get confusing from there….some of Hudson have a lot more black than that and sandlock has varrying red…..sandlock is a triple print and Hudson is maybe a double print so I believe there might of been another card that matches up to them…..also did you see my 1954 Sid Hudson with the black face impossible to obtain one shows up like every 3 years or so

[Tedwilliams1918]

A chart I made from all my favorites on eBay

[Tedwilliams1918]

Missing black stamp on his characters face

[Tedwilliams1918]

https://vintagebaseballcardvariation...ibextid=Zxz2cZ

[Tedwilliams1918]

Black face

[Tedwilliams1918]

Just bought this on my Facebook group….has the logo in purple and has the white bulge in the yellow rectangle

[Tedwilliams1918]

Really helps explain hudson/sandlock

[Sliphorn]

Originally Posted by Tedwilliams1918

Really helps explain hudson/sandlock

Was Sandlock double-printed? The card on the right in your scan shows some black all the way down the left margin but Hudson has blue skies on the right side of his. Interesting.