 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-03-2021, 12:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
1933 Tatoo Orbit Set
Hello everyone, does anyone know if the sizes can vary in that 1933 Tatoo Orbit set? I have a graded Connie Mack SGC 40 that does not measure 2 inches wide. I also have several ungraded cards that measure exactly the same as my graded Mack card.
Thank You, Richard Last edited by timelord; 02-03-2021 at 12:41 PM. 
|
|
#2
02-03-2021, 12:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tattoo
Are you talking about the R305 or the R308? They are both from 1933.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. Last edited by buymycards; 02-03-2021 at 12:51 PM.
|
|
#3
02-03-2021, 02:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
02-03-2021, 05:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
For what it's worth, I sent a set to PSA a few years ago and they all came back slabbed and with no indication of size variation.
__________________
Baseball cards will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no baseball cards.--The Fabulous Furry Freak Bros. (paraphrased)
|
|
#5
02-03-2021, 08:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Okay, if we are getting into semantics about this set wouldn't the correct description actually be the "Orbit Tattoo" set as opposed to the "Tattoo Orbit" set? (Or more specifically "Orbit Gum Tattoo Chewing Gum" cards)
Just one of those things that has always bugged me a little, I admit Tattoo Orbit sounds way better but Orbit was the company and Tattoo was the brand.
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562
|
|
#6
02-03-2021, 09:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
[QUOTE=rhettyeakley;2064130]Okay, if we are getting into semantics about this set wouldn't the correct description actually be the "Orbit Tattoo" set as opposed to the "Tattoo Orbit" set? (Or more specifically "Orbit Gum Tattoo Chewing Gum" cards)[QUOTE]
I vote for "Orbit Tattoo Gum Chewing Gum" cards. As far as sizing, I have never noticed much variance. I would have to check my off-center Cuyler to see if he measures the same as a more typical card. Shown are the R305 Cuyler, and all in one scan for sizing comparison - R305 Martin, R308 Martin (regular size) and R308 Martin (large size) Brian
|
|
#7
02-04-2021, 07:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
[QUOTE=brianp-beme;2064159][QUOTE=rhettyeakley;2064130]Okay, if we are getting into semantics about this set wouldn't the correct description actually be the "Orbit Tattoo" set as opposed to the "Tattoo Orbit" set? (Or more specifically "Orbit Gum Tattoo Chewing Gum" cards)
Quote:
That's a mouthful! Although not correct, Tattoo Orbit just sounds cool.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1933 Tatoo Orbit r308 Dykes...rare type card - $45 | shammus | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 02-02-2012 04:34 PM |
| 1933 Tatoo Orbit - Blaeholder - $$ reduced | murcerfan | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-21-2012 09:10 PM |
| 1933 Tatoo Orbit Help | Semitar6 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-29-2011 04:44 PM |
| 1933 Tatoo Orbit Jurges PSA-2 - Ending Wednesday | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 04-01-2008 04:34 PM |
| FS 1933 Tatoo Orbit Jurges PSA-2 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-23-2008 07:46 PM |
Linear Mode
