|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Same theory; this just started a couple of months ago. Here is a thread to read about it:
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=254339 FWIW, a lot of 10 1968 Topps commons SGC graded between 6-7 all with purple stickers just sold for only $33 on a major eBay seller's recent auction. So if those stickers cost $5 each and many of the owner's cards were evaluated and not given purple stickers, the consignor took a cold bath with those cards.. https://www.ebay.com/itm/-/372333213...2047675.l10137 ...may have to click "listing" if it forwards you to another auction like it has been doing lately.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 06-21-2018 at 07:46 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Similar to this one I have - stunning, but a flaw.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Exactly I don't see how that card is a 2.5
It is Amazing (And the Issue is on the Back not the Front). I have seen Other 2.5 Cards that look like They Got Ran Over By a Car (On Both Sides). |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Two great cards, especially that WaJo, wow Jon - is there any paper loss at the bottom where there was never any writing?
__________________
Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359235@N05/sets/ Ebay listings: https://www.ebay.com/sch/harrydoyle/...p2047675.l2562 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Both have been glued into an album at one time, hence the back damage and grades.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
No real paper loss on the back. Just some glue residue.
Scott - agreed. The grade is the technical grade for the card. However, I'd take 2.5s that look like the WaJo all day long.
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
The grade is technically correct. Practically speaking, IMO this is one of the nicest looking examples out there, and I would rather own this over many higher graded examples out there.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1915 Cracker Jack's in PSA 7 or 8's | PSACJ | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 10-23-2012 06:04 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Adams, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Toole | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 02-01-2012 07:19 PM |
1914 Cracker Jack Lord, 1915 Cracker Jack O'Neill | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2011 05:22 PM |
WTB 1915 Cracker Jack | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 08-01-2007 06:07 PM |
1915 Cracker Jack Doolan, 1915 M101-5 Konetchy | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 06-09-2007 10:29 AM |