Vintage Tobacco Packs- Let's see them

[sb1]

Originally Posted by Corporal Lance Boil

Really great pictures!. A "TTT", too...wonder how many of those exist?

Three that Jon and I are aware, bound to be others, but no new ones seen in the last decade.

The one I got from Henry and a few other Ramly boxes.

[jerrys]

The birth of card collecting - matching the 19th century tobacco/cigarette brand packs to baseball cards.

http://bcc.anaclubs.org/packs.htm

[Eggoman]

Here's a couple more that may not have been posted yet. The Royal Bengals is a non-sport set, but the packs are full and I like the graphics, too!

[1880nonsports]

and dag nabbit I have never seen that scorecard slide on a Hassan pack - that is QUITE special although surely not unique. It makes some sense as they used base ball in a few of their offerings and advertising. VERY neat - to me anyway as I can't recall any other packs including an interactive component. Anyone else?

[1880nonsports]

them is spectacular.

Jay - OK OK I knew that :-)

[1880nonsports]

Did you write it? Perfect opportunity to post it. I might suggest while it's true that cards were initially produced and put into packs to stimulate sales - what precipitated their inclusion into packs was that there was an increasing outcry at the "scandalous" and suggestive LARGE photographic and chromolithographic advertising pieces that were being displayed in shop windows. Putting their advertising INTO the product was a way of getting around this and therein fulfilled a dual purpose. Now perhaps there's some conjecture involved - but I have read contemporaneous accounts of such righteous indignation.

I have only read part of the article but did notice the Yum Yum tin. I know there was a paper notice referring to base ball cards being included attached on the bottom? Was it the rectangular tin or the pail or perhaps both?

adding: I agree that the four base hits likely came in a similar package to the Kalamazoo as I have 2/3 examples that are similar for different brands. I think packaging WILL be found.
I think it's conceptually a mistake to call the Gold Coin a "pack" as I think it most likely was a paper PACKAGE although I have no concrete evidence. Because of that, a couple redemption offers for the labels, and the graphics are flat - we may never find an actual package. As I write this - I'm thinking that might not even be the appropriate package. I'll get back to you :-)

[tedzan]

Mayo & Bros. Tobacco tins and N300 cards perfect together in 1895


..........






TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[canjond]

Originally Posted by 1880nonsports

and dag nabbit I have never seen that scorecard slide on a Hassan pack - that is QUITE special although surely not unique. It makes some sense as they used base ball in a few of their offerings and advertising. VERY neat - to me anyway as I can't recall any other packs including an interactive component. Anyone else?

Henry-

I believe the Hassan packs that had a T202 triple folder inside were printed with the scorer on the back of the inner slide. I have 2 Hassan packs in my collection, both of which were from a find in 1994 that were unopened and contained T202s (both were subsequently opened before I could purchase them). In both circumstances, the inner slide had a scorer.

- Jon

[1880nonsports]

I would expect that to be the case but never thought it out. Adds to my appreciation for the series. I must keep an eye out now :-)

[jerrys]

Yes Henry, this article was published in Beckett's Vintage Collector last year.

What was scandalous about advertising displays in shop windows? I have not encounter that circumstance in my search. For one of his other incentives Duke would find every social and patriotic event to donate free cigarettes to encourage cigarette smoking.

Yum Yum tin is just a prop from my files - don't need the real thing in this case.

Gold Coin (pack and package are synonyms) - I favor your crystal ball's response that GC packaging WILL be found. My cheap crystal ball does not respond.

Hope you get to finish reading the article soon - good stuff at the end - Teddy stepped in - the bad guy lost!


With your expertise you should write - there are many areas still unexplored. Guess you would agree just uploading pictures without explanation is not as rewarding.

[canjond]

With respect to Yum Yum, as far as I'm aware, only the square tins have been found with the labeling about cards being packaged inside.

[GasHouseGang]

This is the only related item I own. Don't know if it would have ever contained any cards.

[Joe_G.]

Originally Posted by jerrys

The birth of card collecting - matching the 19th century tobacco/cigarette brand packs to baseball cards.

http://bcc.anaclubs.org/packs.htm

Hello Jerry, your summary on the packs is interesting although I differ on some accounts. One I'd enjoy discussing with the experts would be the ornate GQ pack. Can you provide any reference to the ornate GQ packs being used in 1888 to distribute N162 cards? Jay's packs date to May 1887 and Nov. 1889, neither being ornate. Likewise, the Round Album which was released in July of 1889 has the plain looking pack depicted (the N162 album, A36, still being offered). GQ was the "cheap" brand in 1887 and perhaps remained so until ATC merger, selling for only 5 cents/10 count pack (Old Judge and Dogs Head were both 10 cents/pack of 10). Maybe the ornate pack is post ATC merger, perhaps no cards inserted? Thoughts?

[Leon]

The dating is correct on the non-ornate GQ packs. They were marked on the inside shell which is different than most other types of dating I saw when collecting. Now I mainly collect rppc's of these types...

Originally Posted by Joe_G.

Hello Jerry, your summary on the packs is interesting although I differ on some accounts. One I'd enjoy discussing with the experts would be the ornate GQ pack. Can you provide any reference to the ornate GQ packs being used in 1888 to distribute N162 cards? Jay's packs date to May 1887 and Nov. 1889, neither being ornate. Likewise, the Round Album which was released in July of 1889 has the plain looking pack depicted (the N162 album, A36, still being offered). GQ was the "cheap" brand in 1887 and perhaps remained so until ATC merger, selling for only 5 cents/10 count pack (Old Judge and Dogs Head were both 10 cents/pack of 10). Maybe the ornate pack is post ATC merger, perhaps no cards inserted? Thoughts?

[1880nonsports]

I will address a couple of things when time permits but off to dive Eagle Grill for most excellent crab cakes. The shop/window displays I'm talking about were those from around 1880 - a time period where I would doubt you have any VISUAL evidence. Gotta run.....

Leon - that Ramley one just SPECTACULAR - I collected RPPC's for a while related to tobacco overall. It's a great niche - so much unique stuff.

[tedzan]

Recently, in a neat little Antique shop in Oklahoma, I found this Plow Boy Tobacco Tin (circa 1910-1912).
Given the condition of it and its price, it was a must buy.














Plow Boy Tobacco cards......1910 Chicago Cubs

Evers ......................................... Brown .................................................. ..... Chance

King Cole .............................................. Sheckard .................................... Lew Richie



TED Z

T206 Reference
.

[jerrys]

Originally Posted by Joe_G.

Hello Jerry, your summary on the packs is interesting although I differ on some accounts. One I'd enjoy discussing with the experts would be the ornate GQ pack. Can you provide any reference to the ornate GQ packs being used in 1888 to distribute N162 cards? Jay's packs date to May 1887 and Nov. 1889, neither being ornate. Likewise, the Round Album which was released in July of 1889 has the plain looking pack depicted (the N162 album, A36, still being offered). GQ was the "cheap" brand in 1887 and perhaps remained so until ATC merger, selling for only 5 cents/10 count pack (Old Judge and Dogs Head were both 10 cents/pack of 10). Maybe the ornate pack is post ATC merger, perhaps no cards inserted? Thoughts?

Some time ago there was a debate here about the two different GQ card formats and the two different design packs. After it settled the relationship was as I display them:
1887 GQ-t1 (plain) N175 - 1888 GQ-t2 (ornate) N162.
I know the GQ-t1 is advertised on a Round Album page. The two GQs must have sold at the same time at least for a long overlapping period similar to the OJ and the Dogs Head's brands.

The GQ-t2 counter boxes are more plentiful than the GQ-t1 boxes and the N162 more plentiful than the N175s. The GQ-t2 packs were better sellers and as you say they were the cheaper smoke.

Possibilities:
1. GQ-t1 had N175 - GQ-t2 N162 cards. (Counter boxes, pack and card match design.)
2. GQ-t1 had N175 and N162- GQ-t2 no cards.
3. Both GQs had both cards.

ATC? Why?

[oldjudge]

Jerry-Can you show a Gypsy Queen Type 2 (ornate) pack with a tax stamp that would date it from 1887 or 1888?

[jerrys]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Jerry-Can you show a Gypsy Queen Type 2 (ornate) pack with a tax stamp that would date it from 1887 or 1888?

Jay - I've never seen a Gypsy Queen t2 pack, have you?

[Jobu]

This is a fantastic thread - simply incredible stuff! I especially like the T213, T215, and T216 packs.

Are there any other New Orleans packs/packaging out there? Virginia Extra? Highly unlikely but I'll ask anyway - Tango Eggs, Mothers' Bread, Weil, Holsum, etc?

I don't have any packs, but I do have the only metal El Principe de Gales box that I have been able to find.

[Joe_G.]

Originally Posted by jerrys

Possibilities:
1. GQ-t1 had N175 - GQ-t2 N162 cards. (Counter boxes, pack and card match design.)
2. GQ-t1 had N175 and N162- GQ-t2 no cards.
3. Both GQs had both cards.

ATC? Why?

Jerry, we continue to learn more about the card sets and related items with time. For example, since publishing the OJ book ten years ago we know more about Goodwin, the cards issued, the distribution, redemption offers, etc. In the book you will find reference to belief that there were no baseball cards distributed in Dogs Head packs and we now know that is wrong. Every Dogs Head pack had an N172 + another card (initially N163 - Dogs of the World, followed by N165 Games & Sports). That is, until ATC merger.

Per your options above, I believe Option 2 is most likely, the plain box was used for both N175 and N162. N162 cards may have also been inserted in OJ packs once the baseball season ended as it was a set that covered far more than baseball. It wasn't until 1889 that Goodwin, per the Tobacco Journal that I wrote about in the last issue of Old Cardboard, kept the baseball player portraits (N172s) in the packs year round.

Regarding 5 cent packs such as GQ, there were others that had high quality cards inserted such as Duke's Best (N84 playing cards + N85 Postage Stamp cards), two color cards in one pack of 5 cent smokes.

Here is a more complete, yet small image of the ornate pack courtesy of Jim Shaw (doesn't own it but shared image). After the ATC merger there were a lot of changes to the lesser brands, the distribution and packaging often changed (sometimes ceased altogether if experimenting with it failed).

Enough about GQ Your dating on N28 and N29 cards are off a bit, it should state fall of 1888 for N28 and late summer of 1889 for N29. These cards were also distributed in more than just Richmond Straight Cut packs. I've mentioned this before on the forum and published some of the details in last issue of OC. I'll write on this a bit more in a separate thread as there is a good bit to share.


More pics . . . Here are a couple images of a candy & tobacco store from Grand Haven, MI (dated on back as 1913).

If you look hard at the shelf below the pipes (top) you will see OBAK, Fatima, and others. Henry, looks like the Tiger Chewing Tobacco tin at bottom center is a match to the one in your display.

[canjond]

Neither belong to me, but both incredible items.

[NYHighlanderFan]

The counterfeit "GQ" packet posted earlier in this thread must have existed at some point. It would be the ATC variation, possibly early-mid 1890's? Has anyone seen a true pack of that design?

[jerrys]

Originally Posted by Joe_G.

Jerry, we continue to learn more about the card sets and related items with time. For example, since publishing the OJ book ten years ago we know more about Goodwin, the cards issued, the distribution, redemption offers, etc. In the book you will find reference to belief that there were no baseball cards distributed in Dogs Head packs and we now know that is wrong. Every Dogs Head pack had an N172 + another card (initially N163 - Dogs of the World, followed by N165 Games & Sports). That is, until ATC merger.

Per your options above, I believe Option 2 is most likely, the plain box was used for both N175 and N162. N162 cards may have also been inserted in OJ packs once the baseball season ended as it was a set that covered far more than baseball. It wasn't until 1889 that Goodwin, per the Tobacco Journal that I wrote about in the last issue of Old Cardboard, kept the baseball player portraits (N172s) in the packs year round.

Regarding 5 cent packs such as GQ, there were others that had high quality cards inserted such as Duke's Best (N84 playing cards + N85 Postage Stamp cards), two color cards in one pack of 5 cent smokes.

Here is a more complete, yet small image of the ornate pack courtesy of Jim Shaw (doesn't own it but shared image). After the ATC merger there were a lot of changes to the lesser brands, the distribution and packaging often changed (sometimes ceased altogether if experimenting with it failed).

Enough about GQ Your dating on N28 and N29 cards are off a bit, it should state fall of 1888 for N28 and late summer of 1889 for N29. These cards were also distributed in more than just Richmond Straight Cut packs. I've mentioned this before on the forum and published some of the details in last issue of OC. I'll write on this a bit more in a separate thread as there is a good bit to share.


More pics . . . Here are a couple images of a candy & tobacco store from Grand Haven, MI (dated on back as 1913).

If you look hard at the shelf below the pipes (top) you will see OBAK, Fatima, and others. Henry, looks like the Tiger Chewing Tobacco tin at bottom center is a match to the one in your display.

Dogs Head packs having a two card premium is a surprise.

You suggest option two: GQ-t2 no card - however the likeness of the design of the card to the pack suggest they were related therefore packaged together. They were printed at the same time for the same reason. You can't prove a negative - so why not consider option 3?

In my belief of option 1 or option 3 I show images of the GQ and OJ packs as sources of the N162 on my website. What must I do???

http://bcc.anaclubs.org/n162.htm

Yes, Jim Shaw has had his great tobacco pack collection website on the Internet for many years.

As for the A&G - not scientific, can't set your watch by my dates, the year is as close as I could determine.

The Goodwin group was tough in determining the card/pack relationships also I failed to determine how the 175 large card was distributed.


The Charles Gross Co. was tough also - I received some help from Keith Obermann to correctly attributing the Kalamzoo Bats cards.


Hello - Henry still connected? Have no feedback for page 45.

[NYHighlanderFan]

For you non-sport guys: The Nebo pack in the postcard looks to have reversed colors than the packs seen still out there today.