PWCC's 1936 Goudey World Wide Gum DiMaggio PSA 7

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

I would disclose things I have done to a card as I have before. I have never sent any card off to be cleaned or conserved. I routinely use water, Q tip and a Mars Plastic eraser. Those are my tools of trade and the only ones I find personally acceptable. That Dimaggio doesn't look out of place in a 7 holder to me. And if if there is nothing to detect, minus the shadow left, I don't know how any sane person can fault a grader for not seeing something that can't be seen. Such idiotic comments ....but then again, we are a microcosm of society. Not much better or worse....

So you agree PWCC withheld a material fact, given his prior involvement with and knowledge of the card's history?

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

So you agree PWCC withheld a material fact, given his prior involvement with and knowledge of the card's history?

I am not being interrogated here. Please get that straight...same with the previous question from the other member. I said I would disclose things I have had done to a card.

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by Leon

I am not being interrogated here. Please get that straight...same with the previous question from the other member. I said I would disclose things I have had done to a card.

If you are referring to me, I am not trying to interrogate you. I am merely looking for you opinion. Do you think that Brent has done something wrong? Whether it is the request to bid issue, or not disclosing information about the card.

[Leon]

You comprehended my last statement well. Thank you.

Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79

If you are referring to me, I am not trying to interrogate you. I am merely looking for you opinion. Do you think that Brent has done something wrong? Whether it is the request to bid issue, or not disclosing information about the card.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Leon

You comprehended my last statement well.

There's a first.

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

There's a first.

You have a multi year history of being an idiot on this board based on the posts I have read. At what point do you listen to what other people say about you, over and over again, and leave in pure shame?

I would never be able to show my face in public if everyone I knew through here thought I was a complete moron.

Good lord. Give it up.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79

You have a multi year history of being an idiot on this board based on the posts I have read. At what point do you listen to what other people say about you, over and over again, and leave in pure shame?

I would never be able to show my face in public if everyone I knew through here thought I was a complete moron.

Good lord. Give it up.

Damn, you're stupid! The only multi year history here is the every other month witch hunt and bitching and complaining about PWCC. It's the same people over and over, like the OP of this thread. You're just too new (and stupid) to realize it.

[PhillipAbbott79]

Originally Posted by Leon

You comprehended my last statement well. Thank you.

So my understanding of this is you don't want to comment because your opinion of it is negative, and they are an advertiser? I am assuming this because you did not have an issue commenting about the cleaning of a card and that the card they sold should be a 7.

[Leon]

I am glad you have your understanding of it.

Originally Posted by PhillipAbbott79

So my understanding of this is you don't want to comment because your opinion of it is negative, and they are an advertiser? I am assuming this because you did not have an issue commenting about the cleaning of a card and that the card they sold should be a 7.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Leon

I am not being interrogated here. Please get that straight...same with the previous question from the other member. I said I would disclose things I have had done to a card.

That seems unnecessarily defensive, Leon. I was simply asking your opinion, as I didn't think you had stated one, and after all you are the moderator and a leading hobby voice.

[1952boyntoncollector]

[QUOTE=Peter_Spaeth;1632041]So you agree PWCC withheld a material fact, given his prior involvement with and knowledge of the card's history?[/QUOTE

Leon appeared to say that the card doesnt look out of place in a PSA 7, and PSA was not totally in the wrong for grading the card a 7 So that would mean that someone bought a legit PSA 7. Thats far from scam behavior. Someone bought a PSA 7 and received a PSA 7 as far as the scam side. As far as integrity and civil issues aside, this does not look criminal/scam if some people share those views.

PWCC may of withheld a material fact as well as you keep saying, and other sellers would of disclosed things but that does not change what i said above. Others may disagree but my position is supported as well. The shilling and colluding is another issue.