Wow, not even close on this CJ

[darkhorse9]

https://www.ebay.com/itm/203076305424

Calling out sellers might not be cool, but there's not a single thing accurate in this other than the player depicted.

[Bigdaddy]

That's funny. I don't care who you are.

[Bobbycee]

Originally Posted by darkhorse9

https://www.ebay.com/itm/203076305424

Calling out sellers might not be cool, but there's not a single thing accurate in this other than the player depicted.

On the contrary, I think it is right to contact sellers & let them know it's a reprint, in case they don't know. Nothing cool about listing the wrong information. Granted, you may not be able to prove they are trying to scam someone, but letting them know they have the wrong item/description up is the right thing to do.

[Doc]

They knew enough to know the year of the Cracker Jack issue but not enough to see the obvious date of 1993 on the back of the card. People amaze me sometimes.

[Ricky]

That's embarrassing.

[Yankees1964]

He actually has it posted twice at two different prices, and a 2 feedback to top it off!

[One 'ol Cat]

The thing that is suspicious to me is that the photography was just out of focus enough that might fool some buyers. I mean, you have a "$180" item. Would it be that difficult to take another, clearer picture of the back? I have my doubts about the seller.

[ullmandds]

pretty obvious that's a mini reproduced in the 90's I believe...it has evidence on back of not being vintage 1915. I have dozens of these!!!!!! I'm RICH!!!!

[trdcrdkid]

The icing on the cake is the fact that it’s raw but the title says “PSA 1.5”.