|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1922 e120 vs. 1916 m101-4
Posted By: steve
Which set is considered tougher? And same HOFers in same condition - which sets singular HOF cards are considered more valuable (ie 1922 Cobb vs 1916 Cobb, or 1922 W.Johnson vs 1916 W.Johnson) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
1922 e120 vs. 1916 m101-4
Posted By: Phil Garry
The 1916 issue is probably more valuable in terms of HOF'ers, obviously including the Babe Ruth RC. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
1922 e120 vs. 1916 m101-4
Posted By: fkw
M101-4/5 as a group are overall a bit more common that E120, and hold up better over time. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
1922 e120 vs. 1916 m101-4
Posted By: Michael Steele
I am currently collecting a team subset from both of these issues and the E120 has been easier for me to find material. But this information maybe skewed by the fact that "Davidvintage" has had a ton of nice e-120's over the past few months on ebay. By the way, David is great to deal with as mentioned on a prior thread. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
1922 e120 vs. 1916 m101-4
Posted By: steve
As you get out of the mid-teens (1914-15 Cracker Jacks) - the colorful cards go away. The black/white issues rule the table from mid-teens all the way thru the 1920's. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1922 american caramel E120 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-07-2008 09:10 AM |
Searching for 1922 E120 MARTY KRUG | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-06-2008 10:07 AM |
1922 E120 Speaker VG 3 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-08-2007 07:48 PM |
PSA 4 1922 E120 Ty Cobb | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-15-2007 06:35 PM |
Trying to locate 1922 E120 Frank Calloway | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-19-2005 06:45 AM |