NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2005, 12:20 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default evidence of trimming vs. cut short

Posted By: jackgoodman

Another thread mentioned a card coming back ungraded with "evidence of trimming."

So I was wondering if any of the grading companies have the ability/experience to differentiate between "evidence of trimming" and just a legitimate "short cut?"

And will they grade the "short cut" but apply some sort of penalty or qualifier?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2005, 01:45 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default evidence of trimming vs. cut short

Posted By: Ted Zanidakis

Two years ago I submitted my really crisp 1949 Bowman Stan
Musial to PSA (at Philly Show) for grading. They rejected it -
"evidence of trim". I told the PSA floor "honcho" that I had
this card in my collection for more than 20 yrs. (long before
anyone really thought of trimming cards). He became very bel-
ligerant and threaten to have me thrown out of the Show ! I
walked away and submitted it to SGC. They gave me an SGC 88
grade which made me very happy. You figure it? I can't, other
then to feel that this grading business is very arbitrary.
Having been turned-off by the hassle with the PSA personnel,
I no longer subscribe to any grading service. Instead I am
content to be able to TOUCH - CARESS - SMELL my sports
cards. I feel I can do just as good a job grading them and
most important, I can accurately discern whether a card is
within it's manufacturer's size tolerances. Something that
PSA (and others) has definitely demonstrated it cannot do !

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-08-2005, 02:10 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default evidence of trimming vs. cut short

Posted By: Joe P.

You nailed it.

BTW, due to your article on the 1948 Bowman football set, I'm still enjoying the TOUCH - CARESS - SMELL of that set.

Haven't been to too many shows lately, and miss seeing you.
Stay well,
Joe

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-08-2005, 03:10 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default evidence of trimming vs. cut short

Posted By: Bob Marquette

I submitted a gorgeous blue background M116 Bresnahan with clean back to either SGC or GAI, can't remember which now. I thought it had a chance for a NMT grade, it is that nice. Instead it came back "cut from sheet"??? I emailed them and asked them what that meant and they said that although it was a beautiful card it was cut from a sheet. I said "aren't all cards cut from a frigging sheet?" and they said yes but they could tell the difference in a 1910 cut and one cut later.
These guys need to be working for CSI. This presupposed that someone had an original 1910 M116 Sporting Life sheet and cut the cards out exactly to specifications??? Anyone have any clue what a NMT M116 sheet would bring in mastro??? A ton. The whole thing sounded goofy to me...

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2005, 04:18 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default evidence of trimming vs. cut short

Posted By: pete

CSI, yes...but which one should they go work for, CSI Las Vegas, CSI Miami or CSI New York?
pete-

Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Consensus on re-trimming hand-cut cards? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 18 04-16-2009 05:25 PM
T205 Production Cut Short? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 01-28-2008 12:52 PM
"Cut Short" Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 7 08-07-2007 09:16 PM
Grading short cut T215s Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 2 09-03-2002 12:50 PM
T206 Southern Leaguers cut short? Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 03-28-2002 02:16 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 AM.


ebay GSB