![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tom Hines
I have not seen one of these threads over here yet and just got this today. Not the best one out there (actually very far from it) but it is just right for me (actually a bit of an up grade, my other is a bit more loved). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: RayB
Tom, |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tom Hines
Ray, |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony
Nice Campy Ray! That was the first graded card I ever bought, and still one of my favorites. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: RayB
Anthony, |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Alan Elefson
Here are a couple I picked up at a local flea market on Sunday. The coin is an Armour Hot Dog coin (with the usual stain) and the second is a mini record made by Mattel in 1971 (if anyone has a scan of the record player for these records, I would really love to see it). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave Hornish
Wow, I used to have one of those Mattel Players (Instant Replay was the name I think). The Mays disc, if I remember correctly, was a call of his 500th home run. I think I had the player and 4 discs at one point in 1971. No clue what happened to it but long gone now. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave Hornish
OK-found the player: |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony
This is interesting- got the 2 Leafs today that were posted above, and they look very sharp. Too sharp. On a hunch I ran the certs of all the cards around those 2, and virtually all were '49 Leafs rejected for trimming. What are the chances my two are fine? I'd bet about 0%. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
Meaning what? Your 2 slipped through the grading process? Not that I know much about the process, but the cards surrounding yours that got rejected cards get/got a cert #? Huh? Set me straight. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony
Paul- take the cert numbers on my 2 cards. Plug those numbers into the cert lookup on psa's data base, and add or subtract to the cert number to get the 10 cards on either side. LOTS of Leafs in those 2 submissions rejected for evid of trim. Dan M. had a post last week on CU about a similar occurance and the discussion was whether a grading company should reject an entire submission if a large % turns out to be trimmed. I think they should once it hits about 30%. Based on my 2 cards that don't look good to me I think they were trimmed but the graders missed them- and if 90% of a submission has trimmed cards I would be inclined to think the rest were as well. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
Thanks for the explanation. I understand it to mean that the rejected cards are assigned the numbers in the grading co. database just for reference purposes. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Neal Kane
Here is my National pickup .... also got a Ruth, but that is not post war |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason L
I covet that card! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
just getting started on these 2 "classics" |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave Hornish
An ebay win. I have always seen these in vertical strips but almost always the dyer. These have a texture and backing paper like the issued 77 cloth stickers and are the first I've seen where both players are attached (there are no other players) on the strip. I have one of the thin felt versions of dyer as well but just missed out this week on a 3 card lot with all 3 felt types. Anyway, an interesting little test/proof set or so I've always thought: |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
I like your choices, Dennis. I always thought the '54 Bowman was overlooked. I just started paying attention to their prices lately, and it seems to me that they are somewhat on the rise a little -- at least the better conditioned ones. Possibly they don't get handled as much as more popular sets. I could be wrong. Have you noticed that? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
Anyone seen this one before, the true Rookie Card of HOF'er, Red Schoendienst......... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
paul,54 bowman and 58 topps are the least popular of the 50's sets/design(always have been) and both are among my favorites. in our post favorite set of the 50's i don't think either of these are even mentioned. the 58 topps set is, to me anyway,very much the same design as the 33 goudey and i'm the only one to see it. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Neal Kane
here is what I tried to scan earlier. I picked this card up at the National. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: identify7
I agree Dennis. There is plenty of similarity among the Goudey and the '54 & '58T sets. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dstudeba
Very nice Phil, I have not seen that one before. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: RayB
Thanks Anthony! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: nbrazil
adding to my odd ball aaron collection |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken W.
Ditto on that "Ol' Red-Head," Phil! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4th August Pick-Up Thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 09-01-2008 03:35 PM |
2nd August Pick-up Thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 08-14-2007 11:28 AM |
5th August Recent Pick-Up Thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 09-01-2006 05:03 PM |
4th August Recent Pick Ups thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 08-27-2006 11:21 PM |
3rd August Recent Pick Ups thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 08-18-2006 08:24 PM |