|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: John Freeman
My last question caused quite a stir ("Old Judge Proofs?") -- hopfully this one will be more straightforward. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Jay Miller
Email has been sent out correcting this and two other mistakes. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Wesley
There was a question posed to this forum about the Sporting News back not long ago. Someone asked whether anyone has seen any Sporting News card with a M101-5 exclusive player. If I remember correctly, not a single person had an example of a M101-5 only player with the Sporting News back. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Andy Baran
I spoke to Lew about the Ruth card yesterday. It is definitely from the later M101-4 series, not the M101-5 series as he has it listed. He said that he would make the correction. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Jay Miller
Andy--What you are saying is wrong. I have M101-5's with Morehouse, Gimbels, Successful Farming, Standard Biscuit and Blank backs. Any one of those could be a Ruth rookie. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Jay Miller
M101-5 M101-4 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Andy Baran
Jay, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Todd Schultz
I believe it was I who first asked about this m101-5 TSN back about a year ago, as I had never seen one. Strange how these things develop. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: Jay Miller
Todd--I would say the best bet for the Ruth rookie is a straight letter Gimbels. In fact, I think (but wouldn't swear) I saw one several years ago. Otherwise, if you have a Ruth with a back that could be an M101-4 or a M101-5 you cannot call it a rookie because you do not know definitively which year it is from. Makes all those PSA graded Ruth "rookies" with blank backs pretty suspect. Bob Lemke should put this info out in the SCD catalog and the info should be deseminated to the grading services so such misrepresentations can be avoided. Makes you wonder what PSA's liability is to people who paid up for high grade Ruth "rookies". |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: PSA Passes
Jay, |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Lipset Auction -- Ruth Rookie Question
Posted By: JDWeller
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=57993&item=5128543605&rd=1 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lipset Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-29-2006 10:47 AM |
1923 Ruth Exhibit - Lipset Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2006 08:19 PM |
Lipset Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-23-2005 03:53 PM |
RUTH "ROOKIE" IN MASTRO AUCTION | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 04-09-2004 11:03 AM |
Obaks from Lipset Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-08-2002 09:52 PM |