 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
09-29-2015, 11:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I assume this is an example being discussed. As mentioned, 1920s Exhibits aren't typically counterfeited or reproduced. However, anything for Ruth, you need to be careful with. Some signs: print looks fuzzy rather than clear. cardstock is the wrong color (yellowish rather than white). Some things you really won't know until you have the card in hand such as the thickness and feel of the cardstock and whether it passes the black light test.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 'Judging the Authenticity of Photographs' Hardcopy/Paper back book | drcy | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 09-10-2014 07:21 AM |
| Share your unusual tips/tricks for analyzing an autograph for authenticity | markf31 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 17 | 01-23-2013 01:20 PM |
| 'Judging the Authenticity of Photographs (Fifth Edition)' $10 shipp | drc | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 02-22-2012 02:06 PM |
| New Edition Judging the Authenticity of Photos / Unuse Proof | drc | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2011 12:37 PM |
| Judging Authenticity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-10-2006 10:39 AM |
Threaded Mode