The first card PSA ever graded

[Archive]

Posted By: Scott

Scott Elkins - I debated posting this, for one main reason - I really DO enjoy reading your posts as they are obviously completely un-edited and so they really give us a feel for you passion for card-collecting. And it is very rare that I get "angry" over one of your posts - normally I see a little humor in them and my responses are not intended to generate any anger on your part, and I don't think they normally have that result.

However, I don't think it's responsible to post accusations that have no evidence behind them, or to post personal email correspondence. I've learned the hard way that this type of thing comes back to bite you - based on your fiasco with the e95 forgery you sold as real, and the resulting beating you took on the old board and this one, you should also have the experience to know better. In light of that episode, telling people not to buy my cards because I don't agree that a fuzzy scan posted by t206museum indicates positive proof of trimming, is quite irresponsible of you. I waited for you to either edit your post or retract your comments, but since you didn't, I felt compelled to post a rebuttal. And, no, I won't suggest that your customers avoid you because you can't tell the difference between a forged e95 and a real one, even though the evidence is there to support it.