|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Pete Rose gambled on his team to win, no pass from me. Pick anyone from the Houston Astros a couple of years ago. They all should be banned. No pass from me. :shrug: B. T.
__________________
“Man proposes and God disposes.” U.S. Grant, July 1, 1885 Completed: 1969 - 2000 Topps Baseball Sets and Traded Sets. Senators and Frank Howard fan. I collect Topps baseball variations -- I can quit anytime I want to.....I DON'T WANT TO. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Rose, he supposedly never tried to throw a game and lose, which is really what the gambling rule was put in place to stop. But it was and still is the rule, and Rose knew it. So agree as well. Jackson my be a little more complicated. To this day, no one really knows exactly everything that occurred. There is evidence that Jackson didn't necessarily willingly agree to accept and keep the money, and supposedly the money primarily went to benefit a sick relative in need of surgery and care. His stats and play during the 1919 WS certainly seem to belie the argument that he was actively trying to throw the WS. And there was no specific gambling rule in place at that time for MLB as there is today. So Jackson was permanently banned by the retroactive application of a rule that didn't exist at the time of the alleged transgression. I'd love to see how that would have held up in today's courts, and how fast the lawsuits to stop it would have been filed. Not so sure Jackson was fairly treated by MLB back then, which had their own agenda they were keeping to at the time. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by BobC; 01-05-2022 at 01:02 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Joe Jackson lied over and over in statements to the press and in sworn testimony. He was charged with perjury and failed to show up for his court hearing and a warrant was issued for his arrest. Facts.The charge was never pursued, probably because it wasn't worth going from Wisconsin to SC for a simple perjury charge. If he was truly innocent, why not show up and fight the charge? Read the articles on the 1919 Black Sox on the SABR website, those are fair and based in facts unlike the 8 Men Out book and movie, both of which are filled with so many myths and lies, they are basically works of fiction. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
EGRI- so you've picked Hank Aaron, eh?
Egri- a heartfelt "thanks" for naming Hank Aaron, baseball's most
consistent HR and RBI producer and an American hero. You're helping me.... I checked Hank's stats from 1966-70. His 1968 stats were slightly below average in HR and RBI (29 and 87 rather than mid 30s and 100), with batting average and games played normal. There was no "miracle jump" in stats in 68,69, or 70. Alas, your guys Sosa, McGwire, and Bonds can't say the same... Bonds was a great player whose HR numbers ballooned in early 2000s with 73(!) in 01, about FIFTY percent higher than his second best HR total. Sosa's stats are jaw dropping, he went from a lower 30s HR guy to 4 consecutive seasons averaging 60! McGwire is tougher due to injury, but his 70 HR came- guess when?- during the same time frame. Smell what I'm cooking? Now on to Hank's "amphetamines". Did he use them to add pop to his swing or to increase bat speed? Stats do NOT back that up, they say the opposite. How about for the remarkable restorative/recuperative power of 1960s stimulants? I don't think so. I haven't read the book, so what was the amphetamine exactly? A "greenie"? The equivalent of a Red Bull today? See how they just don't quite feel the same? I would hope so. And again, I am not arguing that yesterday's players are "saints" or "angels". I am arguing that they did NOT engage in a long term, concerted clinical effort that they knew was a serious violation of MLB policy, to beat a cherished HR season record . Finally, the phrases "straw man" and "ad hominem" sound impressive- but it helps when you use them properly. My argument is direct and not straw, and you are on the wrong end of it- at no time did I say "you're ugly and your momma dresses you funny", which would have been ad hominem. The PED guys rolled dice and lost- and STILL might make the Hall. End of story. Trent King |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Don't get Papi upset ...
__________________
Collection on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/139478047@N03/albums |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The early dose of the current stuff which is amphetamines was literally in green capsules. I had to explain to my doctor my comment about it making me feel like a ballplayer. For me it helps me concentrate. Which if I had any small smidgen of talent might have made me a marginally better batter. Ok, 1-1, maybe a curve coming... hey I think the pitcher shoelace is.. nope, just the angle. Hey that's an interesting cloud, and it's moving towards us while the wind is blowing out... STRIKE TWO! Darn it! Got to focus better... From a not so scientific test done in the batting cages up the road a ways. It does not help me hit a pitch moving more than about 50mph. It does not help me hit the ball harder. Some other stuff along with actual training would help hit harder, but probably wouldn't help with the coordintion or reflexes. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Now I wasn't there, you weren't there, and certainly no one from SABR was there. Yet why the total lack of faith in the findings of a jury, that was there, several years after Jackson's career and fame as an MLB player had ended, in a different state/city than he had played in, and that sat through all the evidence and testimony and still found for him, that to me is really and truly the biggest and only question I feel still needs to be answered by everyone so totally against Jackson................PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!! I've seen Carney's stuff and feel he ignores the sway and influence Comiskey had over Jackson and his simple naive nature. I still feel he got caught in the middle by teammates who thrust him into this, and was quiet to protect them from career, and possible physical, harm. Everyone points to his admission of receiving $5K to seal his fate and determine his guilt, despite going to Comiskey with the money to potentially give it back now that he wasn't in fear of teammates or their wives being harmed since the series had ended, and yet Comiskey tells him to keep the money and shut up about it. Interesting how everyone automatically says yup, Jackson is 100% honest about the money he got, but we still think he was pretty much lying about everything else. Now just think how stupid that sounds, he's honest about the one thing that is the most incriminating and damaging to his case, so if there's anything you would expect him to lie about, it was him receiving the money. But no, he honestly tells about money, but all the naysayers still contend he lied about everything else!!!!!!!!!! Go figure. This whole thing around Jackson stinks. Yet so many people just condemn him outright. Let me ask you a question. Put yourself in his shoes, and you have teammates and friends who come to you about throwing the WS series for money, and they need you in on it so the gamblers will pay them. And they tell you that by the way, you have to take what we give you so the gamblers don't think we're double crossing them. And then later on you hear one of your teammates, and possibly his wife as well, have their lives threatened by the gamblers. Oh, and there's no specific rule on MLB's books on what you are or aren't supposed to do in this situation. So, do you go running to Ban Johnson, the AL President, and tell him everything, only to find out your teammate and his wife are mysteriously found dead the day after the news hits the papers, and the rest of your teammates and friends get thrown off the team, never to play in the majors again and become your hated enemies for the rest of their lives, while the rest off MLB secretly brands you as a rat and shuns you forever after, or what? |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You got facts mixed up. Jackson claims he tried to tell Comiskey about the fix but Comiskey wouldn't talk to him. Where did you get "Comiskey tells him to keep the money and shut up about it"? Johnson was not "100% honest about the money"" He lied over and over saying he was never offered money but finally had to admit it. Jackson claims he was never at any of the meetings but Cicotte says he was at at least one. Jackson wasn't some dumb, trusting country bumpkin, AFAIK, 8 Men Out is the only book that shows him that way. Please answer this question, Jackson was promised $20000 but was given only $5000, he complained he was double crossed. If he played to win, how was he double crossed? |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sammy Sosa | Jim65 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 15 | 01-29-2018 05:43 PM |
Sammy Sosa Inscribed 609 HR & Barry Bonds 762 | dirdigger | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 04-23-2016 09:24 AM |
Ken Griffey RC Lot & Sammy Sosa RC Lot F/S | g&m sales | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 03-30-2015 07:44 PM |
OT: Bonds, Clemens, Sosa to be on HOF ballot | t206blogcom | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 144 | 12-01-2012 04:15 AM |
Roger Clemens Vs Barry Bonds??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 12-19-2007 02:52 PM |