|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 02-16-2017 at 10:42 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Im sure you have sold card on net54 and not disclosed things. Maybe its because you dont think they were material, however, as you say 'ask yourself, if it didnt matter, why not disclose it' Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 02-16-2017 at 10:50 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I was the buyer that Brent sold the card to. He bought the card as an SGC 50. He doctored it. He sold it to me as a PSA 7 WITHOUT DISCLOSING MATERIAL FACTS that HE KNEW would have affected my decision. So, with that argument, tell me how Peter is wrong? I paid 75K for a card that I wouldn't have paid 5K for had the truth been DISCLOSED. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Just saying that you agreeing with Peter doesnt support Peter's argument due to bias.. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
What on earth are you talking about? What better proof of materiality than from the very guy who bought the card not knowing the information?
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
right what on earth am i talking about. If there was a trial on a 1952 Mantle being doctored and reholdered, you think the judge would allow that guy (the poster that bought the dimaggio) on the jury? I think he would be considered biased. People have disagreed with you that had nothing to do with the actuall card that was bought or sold. i just value the opinions more of people that werent actually involved about the transaction being a scam or not. As far as what facts occured, yes, I would want to know it from the people that actually were involved in the transaction. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 02-16-2017 at 02:01 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 02-16-2017 at 02:05 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Wow!!!!!
Wowsers!!!!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
This whole chain of events casts a major shadow over the ever so holy bid retraction thread.
"My name is Betsy Huigens; Brent and I own PWCC Auctions. Our company has always considered the integrity of our auctions to be our number one priority. We take a proactive approach towards monitoring bidders and taken action when appropriate. The purpose of this post is to announce the next phase of policing. I’ve historically monitored and managed our comments on the message boards (like this one), so I know how important auction integrity is to the collecting community. It gives me great personal satisfaction to take the next step in ensuring our venue is the most trusted and honest marketplace in the world." "As such, it is our strong belief that in due time, problematic behavior will become a thing of the past. We encourage other eBay sellers to take a similar stance and aid us in supporting the integrity of the eBay platform.Again, the integrity of our auctions is our number one priority. We ask that the collecting community on this board and others assist PWCC in identifying concerning bid behavior on any of our auctions. Please notify PWCC of any suspicious behavior by sending an email to bidmonitoring@pwccauctions.com. I can be reached at betsy@pwccauctions.com if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions. We thank everyone for their commitment to the hobby" Last edited by PhillipAbbott79; 02-16-2017 at 01:55 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I agree theres an added component here as the auction house owner was the one involved on this card when it got reholdered. Theres a bit of an ethical conflict there. Usually i would imagine when something like this happens to a card, its not being sold at an auction house where the owner of the auction was involved. This is an unusual situation. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 02-16-2017 at 02:04 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
That makes about as much sense as pissing in the wind. My response was in regards to not being told that the card was doctored. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that hell yes, my opinion is biased. I said that in a previous statement. I also said that had the information about the cards history BEEN DISCLOSED, I wouldn't have paid 5K for it. That is a material fact considering Brent knew for a fact that if he'd told me that the card was doctored I'd have had zero interest in it. Considering the nature of our past relationship, the fact that I was by far his biggest consignor for 5+ years, and how many times we talked about bad sheep in the hobby and what they do to cards to get them in certain holders, to say that withholding that particular tidbit of information was negligible is akin to saying that the Pope is Baptist. ' |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Peter disagrees with me, but there are other posters here that disagree with Peter. Some say that theres a way to remove substances on a card without even touching the card for instance. Again, i not saying it was not wrong and not saying someone can be pursued for civil damages. However the card is in a PSA 7 holder and was sold as a PSA 7, thats not a Scam in my opinion. (assuming PSA wasnt paid off etc) Im sure the seller of the card will say this wasnt a scam as well, but i would say he is biased as well. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 02-16-2017 at 02:13 PM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
There again, lets not forget why I signed up for this forum today and why I made a few connections with a few people before I started posting. I was informed that what I said would likely be taken with a grain of salt b/c I never post and have no "forum credibility"........so, thanks for that tidbit, Evan Mathis. I signed up for the sole reason of setting the record straight on Brent Huigens, PWCC and the way that they do business.....the lies they tell.........and, in this case, the lies that they fail to mention (pun intended). There was a lot of speculation going on as to what actually transpired with this card from the time it left REA until it just sold through him (again). I'm strictly here to set the record straight, let the community know how Brent does business.
I could really care less about losing the 30K that I lost when I sold the card in Goldin's auction. As part of a portfolio, 30K is negligible in the long run. Anyone with a large collection will tell you that. It's one of the things that I preach. What I do care about is making sure that others don't get burned like I did. Brent earned my trust, but like any rabid dog, when you turn your back, you're gonna get bit. He's a snake in the grass and all of what you guys suggest about him and his company is legitimate and, for the most part, accurate. Has anyone noticed that Brent is still MIA after being called out several times? All those years of him monitoring this board and telling me not to bother with responding b/c "(he'll) handle it". Yet, now he's...poof....gone. Must be on another monthly vacation somewhere where there's no internet or phone service (like HI. LMAO). I'm guessing his attorneys are telling him to STFU and pray this goes away. Guess what Brent Huigens, this aint goin' away buddy!!!! I know you're reading this, I've already caught wind of some of the remarks that have been made about me TODAY. ;-) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Did PWCC recently block all of your eBay ids from bidding on their auctions?
James |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
No dog in this fight, but Cortney you say in post #362 "Considering the nature of our past relationship, the fact that I was by far his biggest consignor for 5+ years, then in post #368 you say "He's a snake in the grass and all of what you guys suggest about him and his company is legitimate and, for the most part, accurate.
Are you saying up until this incident you were clueless as to who you were dealing with? Could we see these cards you've consigned the last five years to be sure we also weren't burned?
__________________
I'm always collecting Hall of Fame Rookies and First Year Cards. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1936 Goudey Wide Pen R314 Joe DiMaggio Type 4 SGC 60 | luxurywines | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-02-2014 03:38 PM |
Does anyone here own a 1936 Joe Dimaggio World Wide Gum rookie? | Zone91 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 09-23-2014 05:13 PM |
1936 Goudey Wide Pen R314 Joe Dimaggio SGC 30 | majordanby | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-11-2011 08:25 PM |
1936 Goudey Wide Pen R314 Joe Dimaggio SGC 30 | majordanby | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-17-2010 04:38 PM |
DiMaggio Rookie - 107 1936 World Wide Gum Cards on eBay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 06-05-2007 01:06 PM |