|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SGC's Response
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
Is that contrary to Doug Allen, he considers all the practices he ennumerated in the first category, including even erasure of pencil marks or glue removal, as alteration ("tampering" is the word he uses), and would reject a card if he could tell it had been subjected to it. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Response to Allegations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 07-28-2012 01:39 PM |
SGC's official response to '52 Mantle debacle | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 02-10-2008 06:43 AM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2007 06:35 PM |
Is SGC's website down? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 04-14-2004 12:15 AM |
SGC's New Message Boards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-14-2002 08:48 AM |