![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are some other pictures maybe someone can tell if real under blacklight
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The fact alone that there is a wagner there with that pristine of condition automatically has me believing that is and the others are all reprints.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hard to tell via photo, but they look like they are shining bright white which would lead me to believe they are some sort of reproduction and not original.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a pic - the Doyle Nat'l is a reprint. The Donovan is authentic. See how the Doyle is bright - the Donovan is dull - again this is hard to see via photo, but is pretty obvious in person.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah the fact that there's a Wagner in this group is proof enough that they are a recent reprint set of some sort.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well these sure don't glow like that one I your pic
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The light is directly over the fake
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
+1 That tiny remaining amount of benefit of the doubt has been obliterated. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If these were the better pictures I'd hate to see the orginal grouping. Oh yeah, they are fake.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Think these are fake as well?
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The T3 Brown looks okay but without feeling in hand its hard to be 100%, and a faker would not likely not write on the card as it limits the value and if submitted to PSA would get a qualifier.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Lol. Gotcha!
https://www.ebay.com/itm/29690568932...mis&media=COPY Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
. Looking for: T205 Cubs in AB, Cycle, Sov, HLC. & E91A Cubs, T206 Cubs master set, T3 Cubs |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+100
LOL Great work!!! People (scammers!) often forget that there are a wealth of tools to track down cards especially when bought off eBay...smh If I had a Wagner and those other HOFers I would not ask net54 if they were real after I acquired them unless I was waiting to get them back from PSA or SGC The mere fact the question was posed coupled with the horrible scans immediately raised major red flags Quote:
__________________
Tony Collecting: 1909-1911 T206 Southern Leaguers 1914 Cracker Jack Set (94 out of 145) Last edited by Kidnapped18; 02-14-2025 at 06:21 AM. Reason: scans |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Good find Nate. Dude bought reprints and then acted like he had no idea they were reprints 😂😂 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leon. I recommend banning the original poster from this forum. Asking experts for an opinion when you clearly know the origin - highly uncool.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He’s been banned for a few days now.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1915 Cracker Jack advertising display with pictures of cards cut out cards. Question. | uniship | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 11-13-2023 07:44 PM |
T206 Original Pictures | atx840 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 12-07-2013 09:16 PM |
Relationship between 1931 Sun Pictures cards and 1933 Uncle Jacks Candy cards? | leftygrove10 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-12-2011 04:53 AM |
Can you ID these pictures/cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-26-2005 10:24 AM |
action pictures on cards other than T202 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-04-2004 07:19 PM |