|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
I'm confused. Can't you guys fight more clearly?
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry if you can't keep up, Scott. (When in doubt, though, just post another picture of the green '27 Yankees ball. )
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I wouldn't want to keep reminding you of your blunder
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Well, I don't subscribe to your "one, true, religion."
Let's just agree to disagree. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I have no idea what you are talking about, but you are the one who seems to have a "one, true, religion" when it comes to neatly-signed, perfectly-spaced, slowly-written signatures on '27 Yankees balls.
I have no opinions on this grouping of Ruth photos. I just thought the discussion was getting ridiculous when you stopped debating the original topic and instead posted a link to a Brees jersey in order to deflect the discussion toward Shelley's credibility. Now you deflect further by bringing up that green Yankees ball? I can talk about that thing all day if you'd like, but I'm running out of signatures to rip up.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, please do, Scott. But as far as I'm concerned, based on your experience, and the number of Ruths and Gehrigs and Lazzeris, and... you've examined "in the flesh," your opinion on these autographs is worth precisely what my opinion on T206s is.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I agree, handling more items should give you more expertise.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |