![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Complete low grade set or high grade star card from the same set? | |||
Complete low grade set |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
101 | 44.30% |
High grade star card from the same set |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
127 | 55.70% |
Voters: 228. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting topic I saw today. Would you rather have a low grade complete set or a high grade star card from same set? And why?
Example: A) Complete 1934 Goudey Baseball Set or B) High Grade 1934 Goudey Lou Gehrig For the purposes of the post, both options are worth the same $$$ wise. Last edited by parkplace33; 09-26-2022 at 10:26 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Set.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I voted low grade as I made the decision 20+ yrs ago, to collect more instead of less. Except for a few cards mine are around vg'ish....
.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always been a set collector so I would go for the low grade set (which I have many of).
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I voted for the set, but I'm a junkie.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1 High Grade Gehrig.
Easier to liquidate. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At this point in my life, I went with the single high grade card. While I actually prefer my vintage cards to have some wear to them, I don't want to go back to the days where I have too many cards that I don't really care about. That, and I've got enough non-trading card related stuff in the house I need to get rid of before I would even entertain the idea of building a card set again.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It depends on the set. I'd rather have a complete, low-grade 1934 Goudey set than one nice Gehrig. I'd rather (and do) have one nice 1957 Topps Willie Mays than an an entire low-grade set.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Depends if I built the set or not. If I'm buying an already complete low grade set vs buying a high grade star, then I'm buying the star card. If I get to build the set, then I'm building the set.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My eyes are so accustomed to viewing low condition prewar cards that high graded ones don't look real to me. So obviously I voted for the set.
Brian |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
depends on the set...size of the set...players included in the set. Caramel...or tobacco prewar set...yes please. 1952 topps...I'll take the mantle!!!!
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm happy with a few choice cards from a set - I voted for the single card.
No Gehrig's yet, or even 1934s, so a Gehrig would be an awesome start. It doesn't have the be a key card from a set even, but one I just enjoy. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have Gehrig, and a few others from the '34 set in low grade. Would LOVE to have the entire set. I'm not an investor; low grade raw is perfect for me. Could not give a hoot about nit-picky high grade BS.
__________________
James Ingram Successful net54 purchases from/trades with: Tere1071, Bocabirdman, 8thEastVB, GoldenAge50s, IronHorse2130, Kris19, G1911, dacubfan, sflayank, Smanzari, bocca001, eliminator, ejstel, lampertb, rjackson44, Jason19th, Cmvorce 354/598 1962 Topps 27/33 1969 Topps deckle edge Completed 1953 Bowman color & b/w *** Raw cards only *** |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Set
__________________
Looking for affordable T205 Hoblitzell no stats; also any T206 Drum |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|