 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-22-2020, 02:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
So, what is the norm now?
Collectors expose high priced card in auction that has been apparently been trimmed. Evidence put forward.
What do we expect an ethical AH should properly do? A. Leave card up, let bidders consider the disclosure of new information as they see fit B. Leave card up, but modify description going forward with evidence of alteration and allow bidders to retract bids if they desire C. Pull card D. Pull card and inform consignor that he is banned from consigning to future auctions This seems to be coming up again and again. As a hobby, where do we stand? Or is their another obvious option I am missing. I don't think this a simple question. Last edited by Snapolit1; 11-22-2020 at 02:30 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Uncataloged Norm Paulson PC's | JMANOS | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-21-2020 08:57 AM |
| FS: Norm Cash Mounted Cut | Smanzari | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 1 | 11-03-2019 03:16 PM |
| FS: Signed baseball....Norm Cash | Kzoo | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 1 | 09-15-2019 12:21 PM |
| 1971 Norm Cash PSA 9 FS | Exhibitman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-21-2009 04:12 PM |
| Norm Showers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-12-2003 06:24 AM |
Threaded Mode