|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
1933 Goudey SGC? Bleed Through? Different Day?
So in the most recent REA auction a SGC 8 1933 Goudey Dave Harris went for $1,170 (including BP). Last night a PSA 8 1933 Goudey Dave Harris went for $10,500. Seems like an extreme price difference. The SGC obviously has prominent bleed-through, but is that so disqualifying? Anybody have a different theory?
https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1607718850 https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1607718875 https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1607718974 https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1607718987 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
So as not to confuse anyone, the excess red is wet sheet transfer from either the card/sheet stacked under it or from a transfer roller, the ink does not bleed thru the stock.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
What he said! Thank you for the timely correction.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
It could just be the fact that one is in an SGC holder and the other in a PSA. I had a buddy that collected the 1933 Goudey set and wanted every card to be in a PSA 6 holder. He wouldn't accept a PSA 5 or a PSA 7. It had to be a PSA 6. He would buy SGC cards and attempt to cross them as PSA 6's. Some crossed, some didn't. If a collector is doing something like that for PSA 8, they may be willing to pay a premium to avoid the hassle. Don't know for sure, but it's possible that's the reason.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
SGC cards just DO NO bring the money PSA does. Plain and simple.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Well certainly a few factors at play:
-It's a common practice to not properly call this a WST as it should be as mentioned above -You're looking at a card that has a POP of 10 in the PSA report and 2 in SGC with none higher -PSA typically gets much higher prices I've heard -More registry set builders in PSA holders -If you're putting together a PSA 8 registry set you want high eye appeal cards -Extremely popular set to put together with a lot of money in the higher end -A wildcard could be a descendent or something unique like that -Someone likely had to have the PSA one at any cost, literally. Often, that's all it takes. The buyer wasn't going to lose it for any price based on some of the factors above. I'm sure the buyer would have had absolutely no issue bidding 20-30k if that's what it took. Is any Dave Harris card worth 10k+? Meh, I guess to at least one person it is and another thought it was worth about the same. I think WSTs are neat and tell a story of the process, but not at the high end grades for set builders. Last edited by oldeboo; 12-11-2020 at 02:34 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Although there’s truth to that, the variance in price on this one is way out of proportion
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by Gobucsmagic74; 12-11-2020 at 02:38 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The PSA vs SGC difference might make the most sense, but it's hard to believe there is that big a price difference. Here's another example where the 1952 Topps House Yellow Tiger variation went for way more in REA as a PSA 5.5 compared to an SGC 5 in Heritage, and the one in the PSA holder has a print line that goes across his face.
https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...e?itemid=72212 https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...umbnail-071515 Last edited by jayshum; 12-11-2020 at 02:56 PM. Reason: spelling correction |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I prefer SGC green labels for pre war over anything else. I feel those cards were graded in a more honest time. That being said, always buy the card not the holder.
Last edited by Casey2296; 12-11-2020 at 10:03 PM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I find it entertaining that people who claim to collect baseball cards are talking about the type of plastic holder they can sometimes be found in and the relevance of that holder to the value of those baseball cards.
Doug "enjoy what you enjoy" Goodman |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
+1
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry registryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryre gistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregi stryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregist ryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistryregistry
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 12-13-2020 at 05:19 PM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
__________________
Always buying Babe Ruth Cards!!! Last edited by BabyRuth; 12-13-2020 at 05:51 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dogs.
Can we get back on topic as to why SGC doesn't bring the money PSA does? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
They were doing that.
It's entirely about the registry and how it's created a perpetual "whose is bigger" contest. With the now sideline contest of "who is richer" which is sort of the same thing. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Gimme a break. A difference of 20% maybe. That does not explain this. To say that is a disservice to SGC.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I have had SGC 9 commons barely bring $10. Their PSA counterparts routinely go for over $100.....sometimes $200. I have had it happen to me personally. Sorry, all grading companies ARE NOT created equal.
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
I agree that the current market is skewed heavily toward PSA for now, and trust me, I do not think it is a knock on SGC, it's just a fact. That said, the wet sheet is a print defect in my mind, and a big one. It's a very good reason for a price correction of at least several 100%. Perhaps certainly not 900%, but things are only worth what they are to the bidders that day to me.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 12-14-2020 at 12:46 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 Goudey Foxx , 1934 Diamond Star, 1933 Goudey Lefty Grove FS | theuclakid | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 09-11-2020 11:23 AM |
wtb to complete sets 1933 goudey 36 diamond stars, 35 goudey, 36 goudey, 41 goudey | asw37 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 12 | 10-04-2013 04:50 PM |
T206 WST vs Bleed Through | Craig M | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-26-2013 08:53 PM |
OT - Rough day if you bleed Cardinal red! | triwak | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-24-2011 11:01 AM |
Ink Bleed on Back of '33 Goudey? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-11-2007 06:19 PM |